From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
Subject: Upstream tree for OMFS?
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 11:49:01 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTilI-GLcmJjC5n2aT-0ywdOK0M5VGSUdEGYXa3VJ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-qy0-f181.google.com ([209.85.216.181]:33821 "EHLO
	mail-qy0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1755927Ab0GLPtF (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 12 Jul 2010 11:49:05 -0400
Received: by qyk38 with SMTP id 38so4455633qyk.19
        for <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 08:49:02 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

Hello fs devs,

I have a few patches to send on to -next for OMFS
and I finally got around to setting up a git tree for
it.  Previously I sent things through akpm or the
trivial tree.

I doubt anyone but me cares too much about this FS
but I thought I'd ask first if anyone wants to be the
upstream instead of me sending pull requests directly
to Linus.  Of course I'll post patches here for
review in either case.

-- 
Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com