From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Rubin Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] writeback: Reporting dirty thresholds in /proc/vmstat Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 09:25:41 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1282963227-31867-1-git-send-email-mrubin@google.com> <1282963227-31867-5-git-send-email-mrubin@google.com> <20100830092446.524B.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, fengguang.wu@intel.com, jack@suse.cz, riel@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@fromorbit.com, npiggin@kernel.dk, hch@lst.de, axboe@kernel.dk To: KOSAKI Motohiro Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100830092446.524B.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 5:28 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > afaict, you and wu agreed /debug/bdi/default/stats is enough good. > why do you change your mention? I commented on this in the 0/4 email of the bug. I think these belong in /proc/vmstat but I saw they exist in /debug/bdi/default/stats. I figure they will probably not be accepted but I thought it was worth attaching for consideration of upgrading from debugfs to /proc. mrubin -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org