From: "Amir G." <amir73il@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Ted Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Rewrite ext4_page_mkwrite, fix fs freezing
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 13:15:36 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTik7pmNpiWR4jZAZALf58S+015dYAw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110511094311.GB5057@quack.suse.cz>
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
> Hi Amir,
>
> On Wed 11-05-11 10:33:17, Amir G. wrote:
>> Can you provide a bit of a wider scope review of how this related to the
>> work on stable pages.
> It is related in the sense that Darrick had to return locked page from
> ext4_page_mkwrite() to avoid races and the result (although working) is
> really like scratching your left ear with your right hand (not sure if
> English has this idiom ;). So with my patches, what Darrick needs to do is
> simply achieved by updating block_page_mkwrite() (__block_page_mkwrite() in
> fact).
>
>> For example, when to the pages get unlocked?
> That's handled by mm code in mm/memory.c. You can read do_wp_page() but
> it's not a light reading ;)
This is why I asked for the cheat sheet ;-)
>
>> If the pages supposed to be stable during writeback, how is this related
>> to returning locked pages from page_mkwrite?
> Returning locked page is needed to avoid races with page writeback - for
> stable pages we want to do wait_on_page_writeback() to be sure that there's
> no IO happening while we make the page writeable for user. But once we
> release page lock, writepage can come and start the writeback. The basic
> scheme of the race we want to avoid is:
> do_wp_page()
> ext4_page_mkwrite()
> wait_on_page_writeback()
> unlock_page()
> clear_page_dirty_for_io()
> page_mkclean()
> writepage()
> maybe_mkwrite()
>
> Because this results in writeable page under writeback... We have to make
> sure page_mkclean() happens *after* maybe_mkwrite() from do_wp_page() in
> this scenario.
>
>> Is the page going to stay locked until writeback?
> No, until the page fault is finished.
>
>> Do I understand correctly that a page will be marked read-only after
>> writeback completes, so page_mkwrite will be called again on next write?
> Page is marked read-only before writeback is started in
> clear_page_dirty_for_io().
OK. that makes sense. I wasn't sure my move-on-write hook,
which is called from ext4_page_mkwrite() is going to be called on every
writeback.
The use case is:
data = mmap(file);
data[0] = 1;
take snapshot 1;
data[0] = 2;
take snapshot 2;
data[0] = 3;
...
That use case doesn't specify when writeback of first page of file happens
and I don't care which version of data[0] is seen by the snapshots, as long
as the snapshot view is internally consistent (it doesn't change over time or
after reboot).
So if ext4_page_mkwrite() is called after every writeback and the page is stable
during writeback, snapshots should be OK.
>
> Honza
> --
> Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> SUSE Labs, CR
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-11 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-10 22:29 [PATCH 0/3] Rewrite ext4_page_mkwrite, fix fs freezing Jan Kara
2011-05-10 22:29 ` [PATCH 1/3] fs: Create __block_page_mkwrite() helper passing error values back Jan Kara
2011-05-17 15:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-18 7:35 ` Jan Kara
2011-05-10 22:29 ` [PATCH 2/3] ext4: Rewrite ext4_page_mkwrite() to return locked page Jan Kara
2011-05-10 22:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] ext4: Block mmapped writes while the fs is frozen Jan Kara
2011-05-17 15:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-18 7:56 ` Jan Kara
2011-05-18 8:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-18 14:03 ` Eric Sandeen
2011-05-18 15:25 ` Jan Kara
2011-05-18 16:40 ` Eric Sandeen
2011-05-11 0:30 ` [PATCH 0/3] Rewrite ext4_page_mkwrite, fix fs freezing Ted Ts'o
2011-05-11 9:27 ` Jan Kara
2011-05-11 16:48 ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-05-11 17:03 ` Jan Kara
2011-05-11 7:33 ` Amir G.
2011-05-11 9:43 ` Jan Kara
2011-05-11 10:15 ` Amir G. [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BANLkTik7pmNpiWR4jZAZALf58S+015dYAw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=amir73il@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).