From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve French Subject: Re: shrinking set of cifs fixes to merge for 2.6.39 to small set Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 07:30:14 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20110412075144.53180566@corrin.poochiereds.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-fsdevel To: Jeff Layton Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110412075144.53180566-4QP7MXygkU+dMjc06nkz3ljfA9RmPOcC@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-cifs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Jeff Layton wrote= : > On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 20:33:42 -0500 > Steve French wrote: > >> Since it is already past the merge window (was waiting to discuss so= me >> fixes with others at the fs summit last week before merge), =A0I shr= unk >> the list of cifs patches waiting for merge (in cifs-2.6.git) to a mu= ch >> smaller set of more critical ones. See below. (I moved the others >> temporarily to a for-2.6.40 branch in cifs-2.6.git). =A0We (Jeff, >> Shirish, I etc.) need to build/test more with this set before sendin= g >> though. >> >> Jeff Layton (8): >> =A0 =A0 =A0 cifs: check for private_data before trying to put it >> =A0 =A0 =A0 cifs: replace /proc/fs/cifs/Experimental with a module p= arm > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0I think we should also put in the patch that adds the > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0page_mkwrite handler. I agree but it had more merge conflicts. > > Other than that, this looks like a reasonable set. I'll plan to build > it later today and give it some testing. > > -- > Jeff Layton > --=20 Thanks, Steve