From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] spinlock: A new lockref structure for lockless update of refcount Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 08:38:40 -0700 Message-ID: References: <5220F090.5050908@hp.com> <20130830194059.GC13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <5220F811.9060902@hp.com> <20130830202608.GD13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <52210225.60805@hp.com> <20130830204852.GE13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <52214EBC.90100@hp.com> <20130831023516.GI13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20130831024233.GJ13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <5224E647.80303@hp.com> <20130903060130.GD16261@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Ingo Molnar , Waiman Long , Al Viro , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Jeff Layton , Miklos Szeredi , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , linux-fsdevel , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Peter Zijlstra , Steven Rostedt , Andi Kleen , "Chandramouleeswaran, Aswin" , "Norton, Scott J" To: Sedat Dilek Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > Can someone summarize this thread (70+ postings)? > Which patches are needed? And fixing what? > ( Can people provide separate patches with a proper changelog? ) > Improvements? The core lockref part is now merged and available in my git tree (and yes, as individual patches with proper logs). Al's patch to avoid the lg_lock is still pending, I'm assuming I'll get it through his VFS tree. Linus