From: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org,
pratyush@kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] liveupdate: prevent double preservation
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 10:27:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+CK2bDGvesu85nODXTbHQDy_UndWyGO-bNHcq5gDReX+fyz0A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <gdu6kqpymqgkzbw2yrvvsrububimn2ocuyi533d6llofqu32kd@sqc6d6hsuzic>
On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 9:47 AM Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> On Mon 16-03-26 22:38:34, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
> > Currently, LUO does not prevent the same file from being preserved twice
> > across different active sessions.
> >
> > Add a new i_state flag I_LUO_PRESERVED and update luo_preserve_file()
> > to check and set this flag when a file is preserved, and clear it in
> > luo_file_unpreserve_files() when it is released. This ensures that the
> > same file (inode) cannot be preserved by multiple sessions. If another
> > session attempts to preserve an already preserved file, it will now
> > fail with -EBUSY.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Background:
> > Because LUO preserves files of absolutely different types: memfd, and
> > upcoming vfiofd [1], iommufd [2], guestmefd (and possible kvmfd/cpufd).
> > There is no common private data or guarantee on how to prevent that the
> > same file is not preserved twice beside using inode or some slower and
> > expensive method like hashtables.
>
> OK, I guess since this is a single bit, we can live with that although it
> seems a bit wrong that LUO needs this in generic struct inode. But all
> other "cleaner" variants I could think of were just an overkill. So feel
> free to add:
>
> Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
>
> Just one nit below:
>
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260129212510.967611-1-dmatlack@google.com
> > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260203220948.2176157-1-skhawaja@google.com
> >
> > @@ -744,7 +746,8 @@ enum inode_state_flags_enum {
> > I_CREATING = (1U << 15),
> > I_DONTCACHE = (1U << 16),
> > I_SYNC_QUEUED = (1U << 17),
> > - I_PINNING_NETFS_WB = (1U << 18)
> > + I_PINNING_NETFS_WB = (1U << 18),
> > + I_LUO_PRESERVED = (1U << 19)
>
> Add comma at the end of line here please so that we don't have to modify
> the last line again.
Will do.
Thank you,
Pasha
>
> Honza
>
> --
> Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
> SUSE Labs, CR
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-20 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-17 2:38 [RFC] liveupdate: prevent double preservation Pasha Tatashin
2026-03-20 10:31 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-03-20 12:53 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-03-20 13:47 ` Jan Kara
2026-03-20 14:27 ` Pasha Tatashin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CA+CK2bDGvesu85nODXTbHQDy_UndWyGO-bNHcq5gDReX+fyz0A@mail.gmail.com \
--to=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox