* Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/122] 5.10.245-rc1 review
2025-09-30 19:27 ` [PATCH 5.10 000/122] 5.10.245-rc1 review Naresh Kamboju
@ 2025-10-01 10:23 ` Mark Brown
2025-10-01 10:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-10-01 10:50 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2025-10-01 10:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Naresh Kamboju
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm,
linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, achill, Dan Carpenter,
Arnd Bergmann, linux-fsdevel, linux-block, Anders Roxell,
Ben Copeland
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 644 bytes --]
On Wed, Oct 01, 2025 at 12:57:27AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Sept 2025 at 20:24, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> The following LTP syscalls failed on stable-rc 5.10.
> Noticed on both 5.10.243-rc1 and 5.10.245-rc1
>
> First seen on 5.10.243-rc1.
>
> ltp-syscalls
> - fanotify13
> - fanotify14
> - fanotify15
> - fanotify16
> - fanotify21
> - landlock04
> - ioctl_ficlone02
> Test regression: LTP syscalls fanotify13/14/15/16/21 TBROK: mkfs.vfat
> failed with exit code 1
I'm also seeing some issues with fcntl34, but that's a timeout so I'm
not convinced it's real. The bisect looked like noise.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/122] 5.10.245-rc1 review
2025-09-30 19:27 ` [PATCH 5.10 000/122] 5.10.245-rc1 review Naresh Kamboju
2025-10-01 10:23 ` Mark Brown
@ 2025-10-01 10:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-10-01 10:50 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2025-10-01 10:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Naresh Kamboju, Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, Linus Torvalds, Andrew Morton,
Guenter Roeck, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, Pavel Machek,
Jon Hunter, Florian Fainelli, Sudip Mukherjee, rwarsow,
Conor Dooley, hargar, Mark Brown, achill, Dan Carpenter,
linux-fsdevel, linux-block, Anders Roxell, Benjamin Copeland
On Tue, Sep 30, 2025, at 21:27, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> We are investigating and running bisections.
>
> ### Test log
> tst_test.c:1888: TINFO: === Testing on vfat ===
> tst_test.c:1217: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop0 with vfat opts='' extra
> opts=''
> mkfs.vfat: Partitions or virtual mappings on device '/dev/loop0', not
> making filesystem (use -I to override)
> tst_test.c:1217: TBROK: mkfs.vfat failed with exit code 1
The error message indicates that the loop device contains
existing data and mkfs.vfat refuses to overwrite it, which
would be part of your test environment.
Can you try adding the suggested '-I' flag to the mkfs.vfat
invocation so it overrides the warning?
Arnd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/122] 5.10.245-rc1 review
2025-09-30 19:27 ` [PATCH 5.10 000/122] 5.10.245-rc1 review Naresh Kamboju
2025-10-01 10:23 ` Mark Brown
2025-10-01 10:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
@ 2025-10-01 10:50 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-10-01 12:10 ` Dan Carpenter
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2025-10-01 10:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Naresh Kamboju
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill,
Dan Carpenter, Arnd Bergmann, linux-fsdevel, linux-block,
Anders Roxell, Ben Copeland
On Wed, Oct 01, 2025 at 12:57:27AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Sept 2025 at 20:24, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.245 release.
> > There are 122 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Thu, 02 Oct 2025 14:37:59 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.245-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> The following LTP syscalls failed on stable-rc 5.10.
> Noticed on both 5.10.243-rc1 and 5.10.245-rc1
>
> First seen on 5.10.243-rc1.
>
> ltp-syscalls
> - fanotify13
> - fanotify14
> - fanotify15
> - fanotify16
> - fanotify21
> - landlock04
> - ioctl_ficlone02
>
> Test regression: LTP syscalls fanotify13/14/15/16/21 TBROK: mkfs.vfat
> failed with exit code 1
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
>
> We are investigating and running bisections.
>
> ### Test log
> tst_test.c:1888: TINFO: === Testing on vfat ===
> tst_test.c:1217: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop0 with vfat opts='' extra opts=''
> mkfs.vfat: Partitions or virtual mappings on device '/dev/loop0', not
> making filesystem (use -I to override)
> tst_test.c:1217: TBROK: mkfs.vfat failed with exit code 1
> HINT: You _MAY_ be missing kernel fixes:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=c285a2f01d69
You are not missing this "fix".
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=bc2473c90fca
You are missing that one, but why is a overlayfs commit being cared
about for vfat?
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=c45beebfde34a
Another overlayfs patch that is not backported that far. Again, why is
this a hint for vfat?
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/122] 5.10.245-rc1 review
2025-10-01 10:50 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2025-10-01 12:10 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-10-01 12:22 ` Naresh Kamboju
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2025-10-01 12:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Naresh Kamboju, stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm,
linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill,
Arnd Bergmann, linux-fsdevel, linux-block, Anders Roxell,
Ben Copeland
On Wed, Oct 01, 2025 at 12:50:13PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2025 at 12:57:27AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Sept 2025 at 20:24, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.245 release.
> > > There are 122 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Thu, 02 Oct 2025 14:37:59 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.245-rc1.gz
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> >
> > The following LTP syscalls failed on stable-rc 5.10.
> > Noticed on both 5.10.243-rc1 and 5.10.245-rc1
> >
> > First seen on 5.10.243-rc1.
> >
> > ltp-syscalls
> > - fanotify13
> > - fanotify14
> > - fanotify15
> > - fanotify16
> > - fanotify21
> > - landlock04
> > - ioctl_ficlone02
> >
> > Test regression: LTP syscalls fanotify13/14/15/16/21 TBROK: mkfs.vfat
> > failed with exit code 1
> >
> > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
> >
> > We are investigating and running bisections.
> >
> > ### Test log
> > tst_test.c:1888: TINFO: === Testing on vfat ===
> > tst_test.c:1217: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop0 with vfat opts='' extra opts=''
> > mkfs.vfat: Partitions or virtual mappings on device '/dev/loop0', not
> > making filesystem (use -I to override)
> > tst_test.c:1217: TBROK: mkfs.vfat failed with exit code 1
> > HINT: You _MAY_ be missing kernel fixes:
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=c285a2f01d69
>
> You are not missing this "fix".
>
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=bc2473c90fca
>
> You are missing that one, but why is a overlayfs commit being cared
> about for vfat?
>
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=c45beebfde34a
>
> Another overlayfs patch that is not backported that far. Again, why is
> this a hint for vfat?
That's test output, not something we added. LTP tests can have a list
of suggested commits. LTP doesn't know what kernel you're running, it
just prints out the list of commits.
https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/blob/master/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify13.c#L436
regards,
dan carpenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/122] 5.10.245-rc1 review
2025-10-01 12:10 ` Dan Carpenter
@ 2025-10-01 12:22 ` Naresh Kamboju
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2025-10-01 12:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Carpenter
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm,
linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill,
Arnd Bergmann, linux-fsdevel, linux-block, Anders Roxell,
Ben Copeland
On Wed, 1 Oct 2025 at 17:40, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2025 at 12:50:13PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 01, 2025 at 12:57:27AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > > On Tue, 30 Sept 2025 at 20:24, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.245 release.
> > > > There are 122 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > >
> > > > Responses should be made by Thu, 02 Oct 2025 14:37:59 +0000.
> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > >
> > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.245-rc1.gz
> > > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> > > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > > >
> > > > thanks,
> > > >
> > > > greg k-h
> > >
> > > The following LTP syscalls failed on stable-rc 5.10.
> > > Noticed on both 5.10.243-rc1 and 5.10.245-rc1
> > >
> > > First seen on 5.10.243-rc1.
> > >
> > > ltp-syscalls
> > > - fanotify13
> > > - fanotify14
> > > - fanotify15
> > > - fanotify16
> > > - fanotify21
> > > - landlock04
> > > - ioctl_ficlone02
> > >
> > > Test regression: LTP syscalls fanotify13/14/15/16/21 TBROK: mkfs.vfat
> > > failed with exit code 1
I have re-tested for 12 times and reported test failures are getting
passed 12 times.
However, I will keep monitoring test results.
- Naresh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread