linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: Hongchen Zhang <zhanghongchen@loongson.cn>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.co.jp>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] pipe: use __pipe_{lock,unlock} instead of spinlock
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2023 21:33:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+icZUUdGCdzYvdi3_vdpHqNvE12wsAw3CKCmeut1-R78kjHHg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y7hyw+fTdgAF6uYP@bombadil.infradead.org>

On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 8:40 PM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 05:48:44PM +0800, Hongchen Zhang wrote:
> > Use spinlock in pipe_read/write cost too much time,IMO
> > pipe->{head,tail} can be protected by __pipe_{lock,unlock}.
> > On the other hand, we can use __pipe_{lock,unlock} to protect
> > the pipe->{head,tail} in pipe_resize_ring and
> > post_one_notification.
> >
> > I tested this patch using UnixBench's pipe test case on a x86_64
> > machine,and get the following data:
> > 1) before this patch
> > System Benchmarks Partial Index  BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
> > Pipe Throughput                   12440.0     493023.3    396.3
> >                                                         ========
> > System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only)              396.3
> >
> > 2) after this patch
> > System Benchmarks Partial Index  BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
> > Pipe Throughput                   12440.0     507551.4    408.0
> >                                                         ========
> > System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only)              408.0
> >
> > so we get ~3% speedup.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hongchen Zhang <zhanghongchen@loongson.cn>
> > ---
>
> After the above "---" line you should have the changlog descrption.
> For instance:
>
> v3:
>   - fixes bleh blah blah
> v2:
>   - fixes 0-day report by ... etc..
>   - fixes spelling or whatever
>
> I cannot decipher what you did here differently, not do I want to go
> looking and diff'ing. So you are making the life of reviewer harder.
>

Happy new 2023.

Positive wording... You can make reviewers' life easy when...
(encourage people).
Life is easy, people live hard.

+1 Adding ChangeLog of patch history

Cannot say...
Might be good to add the link to Linus test-case + your results in the
commit message as well?

...
Link: https://git.kernel.org/linus/0ddad21d3e99 (test-case of Linus
suggested-by Andrew)
...
Signed-off-by: Hongchen Zhang <zhanghongchen@loongson.cn>
...

Thanks.

Best regards,
-Sedat-

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-06 20:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-06  9:48 [PATCH v3] pipe: use __pipe_{lock,unlock} instead of spinlock Hongchen Zhang
2023-01-06 19:13 ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-01-06 20:33   ` Sedat Dilek [this message]
2023-01-07  3:31     ` Hongchen Zhang
2023-01-07  0:58   ` Hongchen Zhang
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-01-07  1:23 Hongchen Zhang
2023-01-13  3:19 ` Hongchen Zhang
2023-01-13  9:32   ` Sedat Dilek
2023-01-16  1:52     ` Sedat Dilek
2023-01-16  2:16       ` Hongchen Zhang
2023-01-16  2:42         ` Sedat Dilek
2023-01-16  3:16   ` maobibo
2023-01-16  4:38     ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-01-16 21:10       ` Al Viro
2023-01-16 22:16         ` Andrew Morton
2023-01-17  6:54           ` Sedat Dilek
2023-01-29  2:29           ` Hongchen Zhang
2023-01-06  9:28 Hongchen Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CA+icZUUdGCdzYvdi3_vdpHqNvE12wsAw3CKCmeut1-R78kjHHg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuniyu@amazon.co.jp \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=zhanghongchen@loongson.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).