linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: process fput task_work with TWA_SIGNAL
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 07:21:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+icZUWZePRQ6h8TLekp3EMNvLG22o4stV7OaGVCnm9VeX6d=w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210108052651.GM3579531@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>

On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 6:30 AM Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 11:29:11AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > Song reported a boot regression in a kvm image with 5.11-rc, and bisected
> > it down to the below patch. Debugging this issue, turns out that the boot
> > stalled when a task is waiting on a pipe being released. As we no longer
> > run task_work from get_signal() unless it's queued with TWA_SIGNAL, the
> > task goes idle without running the task_work. This prevents ->release()
> > from being called on the pipe, which another boot task is waiting on.
> >
> > Use TWA_SIGNAL for the file fput work to ensure it's run before the task
> > goes idle.
> >
> > Fixes: 98b89b649fce ("signal: kill JOBCTL_TASK_WORK")
> > Reported-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > The other alternative here is obviously to re-instate the:
> >
> > if (unlikely(current->task_works))
> >       task_work_run();
> >
> > in get_signal() that we had before this change. Might be safer in case
> > there are other cases that need to ensure the work is run in a timely
> > fashion, though I do think it's cleaner to long term to correctly mark
> > task_work with the needed notification type. Comments welcome...
>
> Interesting...  I think I've missed the discussion of that thing; could
> you forward the relevant thread my way or give an archive link to it?

See [1].

- Sedat -

[1] https://marc.info/?t=160987156600001&r=1&w=2

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-08  6:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-05 18:29 [PATCH] fs: process fput task_work with TWA_SIGNAL Jens Axboe
2021-01-07 22:17 ` Doug Anderson
2021-01-08  3:52   ` Jens Axboe
2021-01-08  6:20     ` Sedat Dilek
2021-01-08  5:26 ` Al Viro
2021-01-08  6:21   ` Sedat Dilek [this message]
2021-01-08  6:47     ` Al Viro
2021-01-08  6:52     ` Al Viro
2021-01-08  6:46   ` Al Viro
2021-01-08 15:13     ` Jens Axboe
2021-01-08 15:58       ` Al Viro
2021-01-08 16:10         ` Jens Axboe
2021-01-08 16:26           ` Jens Axboe
2021-01-08 18:05             ` Al Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CA+icZUWZePRQ6h8TLekp3EMNvLG22o4stV7OaGVCnm9VeX6d=w@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).