From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: kuba@kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, brauner@kernel.org,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] splice, net: Fix splice_to_socket() for O_NONBLOCK socket
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 16:51:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAASaF6yKxWaW6me0Y+vSEo0qUm_LTyL5CPVka75EPg_yq4MO9g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <64434.1690193532@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 12:12 PM David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > LTP sendfile07 [1], which expects sendfile() to return EAGAIN when
> > transferring data from regular file to a "full" O_NONBLOCK socket,
> > started failing after commit 2dc334f1a63a ("splice, net: Use
> > sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather than ->sendpage()").
> > sendfile() no longer immediately returns, but now blocks.
> >
> > Removed sock_sendpage() handled this case by setting a MSG_DONTWAIT
> > flag, fix new splice_to_socket() to do the same for O_NONBLOCK sockets.
>
> Does this actually work correctly in all circumstances?
>
> The problem might come if you have a splice from a non-rewindable source
> through a temporary pipe (eg. sendfile() using splice_direct_to_actor()).
I assumed this was safe, since sendfile / splice_direct_to_actor()
requires input to be seekable.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-24 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-19 9:07 [PATCH] splice, net: Fix splice_to_socket() for O_NONBLOCK socket Jan Stancek
2023-07-24 10:12 ` David Howells
2023-07-24 14:51 ` Jan Stancek [this message]
2023-07-24 15:44 ` David Howells
2023-07-24 17:09 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-24 17:37 ` Jan Stancek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAASaF6yKxWaW6me0Y+vSEo0qUm_LTyL5CPVka75EPg_yq4MO9g@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jstancek@redhat.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).