From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A793DC04AAF for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 16:10:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84EE720848 for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 16:10:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726899AbfEPQKc (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 May 2019 12:10:32 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-f196.google.com ([209.85.208.196]:33231 "EHLO mail-lj1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726761AbfEPQKb (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 May 2019 12:10:31 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-f196.google.com with SMTP id w1so3672619ljw.0 for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 09:10:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OJVoHOdwqPmtIGZYRe7rwFLvOITb6Eou9scimDVik8g=; b=JBL1tXAneD2P7JzHehKu6All1l+r9l2U+WQBkVg/moWc907ohcWYVQg0L+OHvLyG5O 9tCXeL3wmQx1AWaJA5k8oJ2JLq3BU7IUhjxPXitYEdXkTp0CAkU/Dg9PgpirSWV4raFh lVG2cRQs3CIuRMTLQslyR3ys0dSb11KxtNDiOsM5k4jC8EP8TLD536D52rBC3T+yWhTd x0JGCgqgtMYQdCrGrgLh6GqR1RwAWRgk6RZdUyiLf/FzhCi5PzuJ39flRBKQT5qN0nQc OrUWWTdXk7i0rAdnt1erlK6esOWEDKMNI4DuDLZXOicGvtnY4xe57oydDwoReFgHXx3b 4HiA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWmmPUGFKIbA/zEqAI5HjttqnPXj+oIOyt3+RvydDy/fI6SZXHn e3uJNA+jyexoUj6CDJF/G5Lqs2POTW8Saa4KgbdMrA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqytsMIKpyzg6Sr7Ma0RrX3P9yIKHhEzTRRSX0gI9JlTBX9wZXbT94dI4qFs37peKTqIzS8XBfKzh47Ff2ccEeY= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:2b81:: with SMTP id r1mr22861818ljr.138.1558023029982; Thu, 16 May 2019 09:10:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190430180111.10688-1-mcroce@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: From: Matteo Croce Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 18:09:53 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] proc/sysctl: add shared variables for range check To: Kees Cook , Andrew Morton Cc: LKML , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , Matthew Wilcox Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 8:14 PM Kees Cook wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 11:01 AM Matteo Croce wrote: > > > > In the sysctl code the proc_dointvec_minmax() function is often used to > > validate the user supplied value between an allowed range. This function > > uses the extra1 and extra2 members from struct ctl_table as minimum and > > maximum allowed value. > > [...] > > > > Signed-off-by: Matteo Croce > > Acked-by: Kees Cook > > -- > Kees Cook Hi all, just a ping about this patch. Any tought, suggestion, concern or criticism? Regards, -- Matteo Croce per aspera ad upstream