From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5F19156C1 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2023 11:31:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="VKSEaqGa" Received: from mail-ot1-x32f.google.com (mail-ot1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1158891; Tue, 31 Oct 2023 04:31:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ot1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-6ce2b6b3cb6so3721170a34.3; Tue, 31 Oct 2023 04:31:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1698751899; x=1699356699; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zYGDhB/um96+OSL3bdNH6Xb1xNttdqBHEeOQYlAiy+4=; b=VKSEaqGanVQNrWpcmf21+Tk4hgKRzDH83SR7GX1RqcbDUxCcW84D6P96siXTiGYQrT 0eXNjl8CyMqL+TlaO3JRZ9Ajy87IHVAlUHQKKYjC0lJ5r1vtf7Q6JNnMlhMCuYkSZQCH yYZjMGtfCBxYnYTxUL/lgFlEUpWNRXDPkZ7b2v5kOJRqngsy0k/oAWaRxN+gZKDvaZDE pp0V1oJAt7IiffnbWnpZFLAMm7Z9y4RKaJXguyGCW9R7yYkC/SY8eRqUkHgDfdePXp2w je92RUl54APIbkeDwgrR2en5Ge/DmiSq/Z/g7tWSbUZtlEO27sUR+EOvq96LUtPF+ibQ 9Pdw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1698751899; x=1699356699; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=zYGDhB/um96+OSL3bdNH6Xb1xNttdqBHEeOQYlAiy+4=; b=NrcK82KUZkYEtgSyKznQrpuJdPNt1wq5Odfj08ZehjOndNKw1baVZrNO3XvNDhyo2X +7d4mazDfG1vQFKmFulmjkDJ/gnvV36LMxsxEdGlw4cFXYFCsIA7xFoO5GYQQxWLuV99 4Sj85gwVJsWaKe5Ycn4mlYwkR4mVAU4z/NdKmYj+RW3TYyNohuMK2utYLIEWG3YXomBl Uy+rUherVgf4EksI0pDtr82mKrmedkqMnD3iqig9eUySd7tdjzazn5Khjizl4qUUDYka /+FN2YutgSJC/zYPhYrHk+hjB4Y8UWd55DwoNKhUYjcO1pi7ov/zzbE+GuDHvYkVWs8V cXFQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyMc7wQkxNjiQJMFuIPZ/50ahA9+dLQqqG1aQ/BxH23EuQWFJhs HjFke5I/hgXGL0NJ3QT4eee5MtHSqsUYNRqhgDc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHuYP72qDA7lV1u5U+Et4v2vvDxnY6s+Al6fXDbgkiWs9zjXI2/VLFe0hP5lM6ClxyT2yA6zMq4AXtgvsttkaM= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1e99:b0:6be:ea3e:367 with SMTP id n25-20020a0568301e9900b006beea3e0367mr13025879otr.23.1698751899308; Tue, 31 Oct 2023 04:31:39 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a8a:d1:0:b0:4f0:1250:dd51 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Oct 2023 04:31:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20231031-proviant-anrollen-d2245037ce97@brauner> References: <20230509165657.1735798-1-kent.overstreet@linux.dev> <20230509165657.1735798-23-kent.overstreet@linux.dev> <20230523-zujubeln-heizsysteme-f756eefe663e@brauner> <20231019153040.lj3anuescvdprcq7@f> <20231019155958.7ek7oyljs6y44ah7@f> <20231031-proviant-anrollen-d2245037ce97@brauner> From: Mateusz Guzik Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 12:31:38 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH 22/32] vfs: inode cache conversion to hash-bl To: Christian Brauner Cc: Dave Chinner , Dave Chinner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org, Kent Overstreet , Alexander Viro Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On 10/31/23, Christian Brauner wrote: >> The follow up including a statement about "being arsed" once more was >> to Christian, not you and was rather "tongue in cheek". > > Fyi, I can't be arsed to be talked to like that. > Maybe there is a language or cultural barrier at play here and the above comes off to you as inflammatory. I assumed the tone here is rather informal. For example here is an excerpt from your response to me in another thread: > You're all driving me nuts. ;) I assumed this was not a serious statement and the "being arsed" thing was written by me in the same spirit. I find it surprising there is a strong reaction to it, but I can only explain why. All that said, I have some patches I intend to submit in the foreseeable future. I am going to make sure to stick to more professional tone. >> Whether the patch is ready for reviews and whatnot is your call to >> make as the author. > > This is basically why that patch never staid in -next. Dave said this > patch is meaningless without his other patchs and I had no reason to > doubt that claim nor currently the cycles to benchmark and disprove it. > That makes sense, thanks. -- Mateusz Guzik