From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ed1-f45.google.com (mail-ed1-f45.google.com [209.85.208.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66FED7EA for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 01:47:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-foundation.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux-foundation.org header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.b="RcbXVhLx" Received: by mail-ed1-f45.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-55569b59f81so5942797a12.1 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 17:47:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; t=1704937658; x=1705542458; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=6u030KI6il12QBShR1lcsXxHEUIec68JdndFK14yRTA=; b=RcbXVhLxuTvndQgNP5zPdxsAgMaDGuIrCcY58ETZj24DXrGUjns5tAOIE10JNSbOtE tj0bK4y5NJLbW2AChovtzJRx7Wnxraziq1NhoxLSwX74PD910tmOpGvd6yeYhFaWTCTp +OQjUvQbkqV0fQNUcaAHRS1vEIStocxrTtvbk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704937658; x=1705542458; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=6u030KI6il12QBShR1lcsXxHEUIec68JdndFK14yRTA=; b=fbsgHOzRMghgdRNaJt8OqM7Gwj2mNWBuDdmjZa4MuQB/9k0xTNR0KAv9zIoibx9MzN AKaZUuw/KLVlRrUyr1srgJ/QOXLVE+GEnEX8onV9KUH0b7I4rLHSMZkLuMS0Lq4lKKjP bCkVlmw5R5SkhHcNc2PwZLHYuRPFIpaxsEO37zZXoUrHwqcfAkUPbBSNP6IeT5w9yObS FYI6ppIRSC0eK9t7weBP0h6iohlwfUTWKRt2Lk8BOdmQQCukg84eKeUwAuqpcKJeOD1L OPI7SyiQ8Vw9sqcbeg13umHwoWG0nFCZ8CANg6RTfqQ7wZbqfiVtrnLYWaGnWd6/fvNQ vAxQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyne/hJzX/S7OzlSkPxVXq+nbYnfzW/PmADBR76SUoRj9CDO14t vmVEOJB4XPgSE9l6z4ywaNXmLT5zqHoE/m96R5VTxSGvgHris/k8 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHsH+b5UJpzptsJoeci6kQEWyTxop4dT13EHMQp45Y0Stjp3F+kvtQBSG15Flz+WuMD1X38nA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2351:b0:a28:b71d:6801 with SMTP id m17-20020a170906235100b00a28b71d6801mr169324eja.149.1704937658346; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 17:47:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ed1-f53.google.com (mail-ed1-f53.google.com. [209.85.208.53]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n26-20020a1709061d1a00b00a293280c16csm9052ejh.223.2024.01.10.17.47.37 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Jan 2024 17:47:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ed1-f53.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-55753dc5cf0so5689128a12.0 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 17:47:37 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:abc3:b0:a26:8ee9:9b31 with SMTP id kq3-20020a170906abc300b00a268ee99b31mr175059ejb.4.1704937657031; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 17:47:37 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <202401101525.112E8234@keescook> <6pbl6vnzkwdznjqimowfssedtpawsz2j722dgiufi432aldjg4@6vn573zspwy3> <202401101625.3664EA5B@keescook> In-Reply-To: From: Linus Torvalds Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 17:47:20 -0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] bcachefs updates for 6.8 To: Kent Overstreet Cc: Kees Cook , linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 at 16:58, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > ...And how does that make any sense? "The warnings weren't getting > cleaned up, so get rid of them - except not really, just move them off > to the side so they'll be more annoying when they do come up"... Honestly,the checkpatch warnings are often garbage too. The whole deprecation warnings never worked. They don't work in checkpatch either. > Perhaps we could've just switched to deprecation warnings being on in a > W=1 build? No, because the whole idea of "let me mark something deprecated and then not just remove it" is GARBAGE. If somebody wants to deprecate something, it is up to *them* to finish the job. Not annoy thousands of other developers with idiotic warnings. Linus