From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Cc: linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] bcachefs fixes for 6.11-rc5
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 10:25:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjuLtz5F12hgCb1Yp1OVr4Bbo481m-k3YhheHWJQLpA0g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <kj5vcqbx5ztolv5y3g4csc6te4qmi7y7kmqfora2sxbobnrbrm@rcuffqncku74>
On Sat, 24 Aug 2024 at 10:14, Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 09:23:00AM GMT, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Sat, 24 Aug 2024 at 02:54, Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Linus, big one this time...
> >
> > Yeah, no, enough is enough. The last pull was already big.
> >
> > This is too big, it touches non-bcachefs stuff, and it's not even
> > remotely some kind of regression.
> >
> > At some point "fix something" just turns into development, and this is
> > that point.
> >
> > Nobody sane uses bcachefs and expects it to be stable, so every single
> > user is an experimental site.
>
> Eh?
>
> Universal consensus has been that bcachefs is _definitely_ more
> trustworthy than brtfs,
I'll believe that when there are major distros that use it and you
have lots of varied use.
But it doesn't even change the issue: you aren't fixing a regression,
you are doing new development to fix some old probl;em, and now you
are literally editing non-bcachefs files too.
Enough is enough.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-24 2:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-23 18:54 [GIT PULL] bcachefs fixes for 6.11-rc5 Kent Overstreet
2024-08-24 1:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-08-24 2:13 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-08-24 2:25 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2024-08-24 2:33 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-08-24 2:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-08-24 2:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-08-24 2:59 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-08-24 4:22 ` Carl E. Thompson
2024-08-24 11:48 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-08-24 2:47 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-08-24 2:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-08-24 3:10 ` Kent Overstreet
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-09-06 7:50 Nathan Owens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHk-=wjuLtz5F12hgCb1Yp1OVr4Bbo481m-k3YhheHWJQLpA0g@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).