linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
To: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fuse: disable default bdi strictlimiting
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2025 16:16:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJfpegsyHmSAYP04ot8neu_QtsCkTA2-qc2vvvLrsNLQt1aJCg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251008204133.2781356-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com>

On Wed, 8 Oct 2025 at 22:42, Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com> wrote:

> Since fuse now uses proper writeback accounting without temporary pages,
> strictlimiting is no longer needed. Additionally, for fuse large folio
> buffered writes, strictlimiting is overly conservative and causes
> suboptimal performance due to excessive IO throttling.

I don't quite get this part.  Is this a fuse specific limitation of
stritlimit vs. large folios?

Or is it the case that other filesystems are also affected, but
strictlimit is never used outside of fuse?

> Administrators can still enable strictlimiting for specific fuse servers
> via /sys/class/bdi/*/strict_limit. If needed in the future,

What's the issue with doing the opposite: leaving strictlimit the
default and disabling strictlimit for specific servers?

Thanks,
Miklos

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-09 14:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-08 20:41 [PATCH] fuse: disable default bdi strictlimiting Joanne Koong
2025-10-09 14:16 ` Miklos Szeredi [this message]
2025-10-09 18:36   ` Joanne Koong
2025-10-10 15:01     ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-10 15:07       ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-10-10 23:14       ` Joanne Koong
2025-10-27 22:38     ` Joanne Koong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJfpegsyHmSAYP04ot8neu_QtsCkTA2-qc2vvvLrsNLQt1aJCg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).