From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it1-f177.google.com ([209.85.166.177]:52271 "EHLO mail-it1-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726029AbeLJJbU (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Dec 2018 04:31:20 -0500 Received: by mail-it1-f177.google.com with SMTP id g76so16361922itg.2 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 01:31:19 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87va46pgqu.fsf@vostro.rath.org> <878t11ts2d.fsf@vostro.rath.org> <87woolsbgr.fsf@vostro.rath.org> In-Reply-To: <87woolsbgr.fsf@vostro.rath.org> From: Miklos Szeredi Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 10:31:07 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [fuse-devel] [fuse] Speeding up readdir() To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, fuse-devel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 2:39 PM Nikolaus Rath wrote: > > On Dec 07 2018, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 1:55 PM Nikolaus Rath wrote: > > > >> I am not 100% sure because of the atime invalidation issue. Apart from > >> that, it definitely was not timed out. > > > > The atime invalidation is different because that never results in > > LOOKUP requests being generated. > > I was actually confusing LOOKUP requests and GETATTR requests. I assume > the GETATTR requests would be explained by atime invalidation? Probably yes. Thanks, Miklos