From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DC5FC56202 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 11:53:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA0C2076E for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 11:53:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=szeredi.hu header.i=@szeredi.hu header.b="k6D884fB" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1733110AbgKXLw6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2020 06:52:58 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47072 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1733105AbgKXLw5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2020 06:52:57 -0500 Received: from mail-vs1-xe41.google.com (mail-vs1-xe41.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e41]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 890EDC0617A6 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 03:52:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-vs1-xe41.google.com with SMTP id x11so10914460vsx.12 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 03:52:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=szeredi.hu; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=QYwpUXf9MOd1UXy87SihXPs0Lb5kLuS+SByPITmbzJ4=; b=k6D884fBWg+S/eH9wqhr0dJ1XnzXoK4yq0GDnUZGLEqC4fmd+0BAo7DZVsfzDtPRqd 7oZ9q2dHy7G4z486oytIYVp88b1jx3zZG1jhVFCkWy+v1L/xvE9b9rJKbmckPJ0MiPKR VKu/MZEkF/GYxmzUhsoSkMoOKX8olmHJMkAFc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=QYwpUXf9MOd1UXy87SihXPs0Lb5kLuS+SByPITmbzJ4=; b=dHasMwNCtXAtnu6kNnEyeCyAgbfbRLa5PRReuMXHNsada+egI3eVGBHUtB0di7xhh6 J6fe2HO99jWpOjcie+k++vduYkgxkp2gM7JvbAnOWoa4ATzQbOIVeZkMJzWFlnCJ/0iw 7tQLvR3LuZoY43FwN73CyPDIxnzaQK3mzFovgrQqx5VkytxWkPe6hx4b56mO3kflUVyK vdkcL1kKqmHueTzTSpw7qrozQllHfdQcMFmapRd57qU751vnhR4vA2My5CGCvPrAxgT2 ucVzQBlGx5RN768a1yjlz0dPXSbJTNxusDhP5KCQcU3Z/a0Sr1IlwviYqC+xV2ddMlnr 92Cw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530UeDGesX+NlRakdGGrDfR7WGkwSGE4r3vNHZQu8QjOEASGW5yt Wsr9gqmGqTl07dNg+zAqyXzdi1VOIS8Vb/fJedgtbg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwHqp8yckVbn5c3DrIHcZxQcwm+qnD7l8Sy5hsn+ZsG5bM56gagA8ZuwiB1itkaYHpkkPuC5X0x+6lTIhVjBGM= X-Received: by 2002:a67:ce1a:: with SMTP id s26mr3248965vsl.0.1606218776732; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 03:52:56 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201123141207.GC327006@miu.piliscsaba.redhat.com> <20201124115004.GB22619@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20201124115004.GB22619@lst.de> From: Miklos Szeredi Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 12:52:45 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] vfs: fs{set,get}attr iops To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Al Viro , Dmitry Vyukov , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, overlayfs Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 12:50 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Looks pretty neat from a quick look, but you probably want to split > it into a patch or two adding the infrastructure and then one patch > per file system to ease review and bisection. Definitely. Just wanted to get this out to get early feedback. Thanks, Miklos