From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: JP Abgrall <jpa@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Add support for SFITRIM, an ioctl for secure FITRIM.
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 20:19:04 -0700
Message-ID: <CAKP4w2RPvGNq+qOrNCU_VH=apmesFUEFyfD4YBRdrOBvhef7fQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1402625647-31439-1-git-send-email-jpa@google.com>
 <539A63C1.8010809@redhat.com> <CAKP4w2Tux8nuWW-uOfY+t+B84=PMmt3sFZ8cA6UMg42dSTo0-A@mail.gmail.com>
 <539A6C07.5090904@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Geremy Condra <gcondra@google.com>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Return-path: <linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <539A6C07.5090904@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 6/12/14, 10:02 PM, JP Abgrall wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> You're adding a new high-level IOCTL, so let's get a bit more
>>> visibility than just linux-ext4; linux-fsdevel cc'd.
>>
>> Wasn't too sure about that one, because I didn't feel like committing
>> to other FSes for now even if they do have FITRIM.
>> Will remember to include them.
>
> You don't need to implement it for other filesystems, but whether or
> not this should be a new fs-level ioctl is something worth airing
> out on linux-fsdevel.

 FITRIM/SFITRIM
vs
 FITRIM/EXT4_IOC_SFITRIM ?

I don't mind either way.