From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] Thin provisioning SOFT_THRESHOLD error handling
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 16:06:32 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL1RGDUyv++VcY7UqBfYkfTc02voC0FbsxH50WF-n-qhkb6dLg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <510784DE.3000509@suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-scsi <Linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Return-path: <linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <510784DE.3000509@suse.de>
Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> wrote:
> I would like to discuss at LSF the possible implementations
> and handling mechanism for this kind of failure scenarios.

I'd be interested in that discussion.  With my Pure hat on, our array
can generate these thin provisioning threshold unit attentions, and it
would be nice if Linux did something intelligent with them.

 - R.