From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Olga Kornievskaia <olga.kornievskaia@gmail.com>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
overlayfs <linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org>,
ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, CIFS <linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/11] man-pages: copy_file_range updates
Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 08:52:52 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOQ4uxgeMJWBQn-WRUuqb=Dok4tZ8VBCKusGNLU-MYWGedm89A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181203083952.GC6311@dastard>
On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 10:40 AM Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote:
>
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>
> Update with all the missing errors the syscall can return, the
> behaviour the syscall should have w.r.t. to copies within single
> files, etc.
Below are the changes I have made to V2 of this man-page update in accordance to
agreed change of behavior (i.e. short copy up to EOF).
This is a heads up before posting to verify my interpretation is correct.
I still have more testing to do before posting.
The main thing is adding:
.BR copy_file_range ()
will return the number of bytes copied between files.
This could be less than the length originally requested.
+If the file offset of
+.I fd_in
+is at or past the end of file, no bytes are copied, and
+.BR copy_file_range ()
+returns zero.
But see also other changes below...
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> ---
> man2/copy_file_range.2 | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/man2/copy_file_range.2 b/man2/copy_file_range.2
> index 20374abb21f0..23b00c2f3fea 100644
> --- a/man2/copy_file_range.2
> +++ b/man2/copy_file_range.2
> @@ -42,9 +42,9 @@ without the additional cost of transferring data from the kernel to user space
> and then back into the kernel.
> It copies up to
> .I len
> -bytes of data from file descriptor
> +bytes of data from the source file descriptor
> .I fd_in
> -to file descriptor
> +to target file descriptor
> .IR fd_out ,
> overwriting any data that exists within the requested range of the target file.
> .PP
> @@ -74,6 +74,11 @@ is not changed, but
> .I off_in
> is adjusted appropriately.
> .PP
> +.I fd_in
> +and
> +.I fd_out
> +can refer to the same file. If they refer to the same file, then the source and
> +target ranges are not allowed to overlap.
> .PP
> The
> .I flags
> @@ -93,34 +98,73 @@ is set to indicate the error.
> .SH ERRORS
> .TP
> .B EBADF
> -One or more file descriptors are not valid; or
> +One or more file descriptors are not valid.
> +.TP
> +.B EBADF
> .I fd_in
> is not open for reading; or
> .I fd_out
> -is not open for writing; or
> -the
> +is not open for writing.
> +.TP
> +.B EBADF
> +The
> .B O_APPEND
> flag is set for the open file description referred to by
> .IR fd_out .
> .TP
> .B EFBIG
> -An attempt was made to write a file that exceeds the implementation-defined
> -maximum file size or the process's file size limit,
> -or to write at a position past the maximum allowed offset.
> +An attempt was made to write at a position past the maximum file offset the
> +kernel supports.
Updated to "...attempt made to read or write..."
> +.TP
> +.B EFBIG
> +An attempt was made to write a range that exceeds the allowed maximum file size.
> +The maximum file size differs between filesystem implemenations and can be
> +different to the maximum allowed file offset.
> +.TP
> +.B EFBIG
> +An attempt was made to write beyond the process's file size resource
> +limit. This may also result in the process receiving a
> +.I SIGXFSZ
> +signal.
> .TP
> .B EINVAL
> -Requested range extends beyond the end of the source file; or the
Removed this.
> -.I flags
> -argument is not 0.
> +.I (off_in + len)
> +spans the end of the source file.
> .TP
> -.B EIO
> -A low-level I/O error occurred while copying.
> +.B EINVAL
> +.I fd_in
> +and
> +.I fd_out
> +refer to the same file and the source and target ranges overlap.
> +.TP
> +.B EINVAL
> +.I fd_in
> +or
> +.I fd_out
> +is not a regular file.
> .TP
> .B EISDIR
> .I fd_in
> or
> .I fd_out
> refers to a directory.
> +.B EINVAL
> +The
> +.I flags
> +argument is not 0.
> +.TP
> +.B EINVAL
> +.I off_in
> +or
> +.I (off_in + len)
> +is beyond the maximum valid file offset.
Removed this. Updated entry for EFBIG with in offset.
> +.TP
> +.B EOVERFLOW
> +The requested source or destination range is too large to represent in the
> +specified data types.
> +.TP
> +.B EIO
> +A low-level I/O error occurred while copying.
> .TP
> .B ENOMEM
> Out of memory.
> @@ -128,16 +172,32 @@ Out of memory.
> .B ENOSPC
> There is not enough space on the target filesystem to complete the copy.
> .TP
> -.B EXDEV
> -The files referred to by
> -.IR file_in " and " file_out
Kept this one with added "(pre Linux 5.3)"
> -are not on the same mounted filesystem.
> +.B TXTBSY
> +.I fd_in
> +or
> +.I fd_out
> +refers to an active swap file.
> +.TP
> +.B EPERM
> +.I fd_out
> +refers to an immutable file.
> +.TP
> +.B EACCES
> +The user does not have write permissions for the destination file.
> .SH VERSIONS
> The
> .BR copy_file_range ()
> system call first appeared in Linux 4.5, but glibc 2.27 provides a user-space
> emulation when it is not available.
> .\" https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;f=posix/unistd.h;h=bad7a0c81f501fbbcc79af9eaa4b8254441c4a1f
> +.PP
> +A major rework of the kernel implementation occurred in 4.21. Areas of the API
> +that weren't clearly defined were clarified and the API bounds are much more
> +strictly checked than on earlier kernels. Applications should target the
> +behaviour and requirements of 4.21 kernels.
> +.PP
> +First support for cross-filesystem copies was introduced in Linux 4.21. Older
> +kernels will return -EXDEV when cross-filesystem copies are attempted.
> .SH CONFORMING TO
> The
> .BR copy_file_range ()
Updates example loop termination condition to:
len \-= ret;
- } while (len > 0);
+ } while (len > 0 && ret > 0);
WIP is available here:
https://github.com/amir73il/man-pages/commits/copy_file_range
Thanks,
Amir.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-21 5:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-03 8:34 [PATCH 0/11] fs: fixes for major copy_file_range() issues Dave Chinner
2018-12-03 8:34 ` [PATCH 01/11] vfs: copy_file_range source range over EOF should fail Dave Chinner
2018-12-03 12:46 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-12-04 15:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-04 21:29 ` Dave Chinner
2018-12-04 21:47 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2018-12-04 22:31 ` Dave Chinner
2018-12-05 16:51 ` J. Bruce Fields
2019-05-20 9:10 ` Amir Goldstein
2019-05-20 13:12 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2019-05-20 13:36 ` Amir Goldstein
2019-05-20 13:58 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2019-05-20 14:02 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-12-05 14:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-05 21:08 ` Dave Chinner
2018-12-05 21:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-03 8:34 ` [PATCH 02/11] vfs: introduce generic_copy_file_range() Dave Chinner
2018-12-03 10:03 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-12-03 23:00 ` Dave Chinner
2018-12-04 15:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-03 8:34 ` [PATCH 03/11] vfs: no fallback for ->copy_file_range Dave Chinner
2018-12-03 10:22 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-12-03 23:02 ` Dave Chinner
2018-12-06 4:16 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-12-06 21:30 ` Dave Chinner
2018-12-07 5:38 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-12-03 18:23 ` Anna Schumaker
2018-12-04 15:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-03 8:34 ` [PATCH 04/11] vfs: add missing checks to copy_file_range Dave Chinner
2018-12-03 12:42 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-12-03 19:04 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-12-03 21:33 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2018-12-03 23:04 ` Dave Chinner
2018-12-04 15:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-12 11:31 ` Luis Henriques
2018-12-12 16:42 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-12-12 18:55 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2018-12-12 19:42 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-12-12 20:22 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2018-12-13 10:29 ` Luis Henriques
2018-12-03 8:34 ` [PATCH 05/11] vfs: use inode_permission in copy_file_range() Dave Chinner
2018-12-03 12:47 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-12-03 18:18 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-12-03 23:55 ` Dave Chinner
2018-12-05 17:28 ` J. Bruce Fields
2018-12-03 18:53 ` Eric Biggers
2018-12-04 15:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-03 8:34 ` [PATCH 06/11] vfs: copy_file_range needs to strip setuid bits Dave Chinner
2018-12-03 12:51 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-12-04 15:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-03 8:34 ` [PATCH 07/11] vfs: copy_file_range should update file timestamps Dave Chinner
2018-12-03 10:47 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-12-03 17:33 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2018-12-03 18:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-12-03 23:19 ` Dave Chinner
2018-12-04 15:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-03 8:34 ` [PATCH 08/11] vfs: push EXDEV check down into ->remap_file_range Dave Chinner
2018-12-03 11:04 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-12-03 19:11 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-12-03 23:37 ` Dave Chinner
2018-12-03 23:58 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-12-04 9:17 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-12-03 23:34 ` Dave Chinner
2018-12-03 18:24 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-12-04 8:18 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2018-12-03 8:34 ` [PATCH 09/11] vfs: push copy_file_ranges -EXDEV checks down Dave Chinner
2018-12-03 12:36 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-12-03 17:58 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2018-12-03 18:53 ` Anna Schumaker
2018-12-03 19:27 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2018-12-03 23:40 ` Dave Chinner
2018-12-04 15:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-04 22:18 ` Dave Chinner
2018-12-04 23:33 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2018-12-05 14:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-05 17:01 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2018-12-03 8:34 ` [PATCH 10/11] vfs: allow generic_copy_file_range to copy across devices Dave Chinner
2018-12-03 12:54 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-12-03 8:34 ` [PATCH 11/11] ovl: allow cross-device copy_file_range calls Dave Chinner
2018-12-03 12:55 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-12-03 8:39 ` [PATCH 12/11] man-pages: copy_file_range updates Dave Chinner
2018-12-03 13:05 ` Amir Goldstein
2019-05-21 5:52 ` Amir Goldstein [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAOQ4uxgeMJWBQn-WRUuqb=Dok4tZ8VBCKusGNLU-MYWGedm89A@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olga.kornievskaia@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).