From: Li Xi <pkuelelixi@gmail.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>,
"viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] quota: add project quota support
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 16:15:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPTn0cBXjePDOmT+dr4VOVs1r9sKbFC16pJv1fTc_oHLNYLsDA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140910164559.GA10507@quack.suse.cz>
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:45 AM, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
> On Wed 10-09-14 11:52:35, Li Xi wrote:
>> Adds general codes to enforces project quota limits
>>
>> This patch adds support for a new quota type PRJQUOTA for project quota
>> enforcement. Also a new method get_projid() is added into dquot_operations
>> structure.
>>
> One general note:
> Your mail client has apparently mangled the patch (replaced tabs with
> spaces). Please resend patches using git-send-email or some other email
> client that doesn't do this so that they can be applied cleanly.
>
> Some other comments below.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Li Xi <lixi <at> ddn.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
>> ---
>> Index: linux.git/fs/quota/dquot.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux.git.orig/fs/quota/dquot.c
>> +++ linux.git/fs/quota/dquot.c
>> @@ -161,6 +161,19 @@ static struct quota_module_name module_n
>> /* SLAB cache for dquot structures */
>> static struct kmem_cache *dquot_cachep;
>>
>> +static inline unsigned long compat_qtype2bits(int type)
>> +{
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_QUOTA_PROJECT
> I don't find CONFIG_QUOTA_PROJECT all that useful. If someone is building
> a kernel with CONFIG_QUOTA enabled (i.e., a kernel for a server), he can
> well spare those few kilobytes for project quota support and it makes the
> code somewhat nicer. So I would just remove this config option.
>
>> + unsigned long qtype_bits = QUOTA_ALL_BIT;
>> +#else
>> + unsigned long qtype_bits = QUOTA_USR_BIT | QUOTA_GRP_BIT;
>> +#endif
>> + if (type != -1) {
>> + qtype_bits = 1 << type;
>> + }
>> + return qtype_bits;
>> +}
>> +
>> int register_quota_format(struct quota_format_type *fmt)
>> {
>> spin_lock(&dq_list_lock);
>> @@ -250,7 +263,8 @@ struct dqstats dqstats;
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(dqstats);
>>
>> static qsize_t inode_get_rsv_space(struct inode *inode);
>> -static void __dquot_initialize(struct inode *inode, int type);
>> +static void __dquot_initialize(struct inode *inode,
>> + unsigned long qtype_bits);
> I've noticed you are changing interface of several functions from taking
> a type number (or -1) to taking a bitmask. I guess it's because of
> CONFIG_QUOTA_PROJECT or is there also any other reason? If we get rid of
> that config, we won't need this change either, right?
>
> ...
>> Index: linux.git/include/uapi/linux/quota.h
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux.git.orig/include/uapi/linux/quota.h
>> +++ linux.git/include/uapi/linux/quota.h
>> @@ -36,11 +36,12 @@
>> #include <linux/errno.h>
>> #include <linux/types.h>
>>
>> -#define __DQUOT_VERSION__ "dquot_6.5.2"
>> +#define __DQUOT_VERSION__ "dquot_6.6.0"
>>
>> -#define MAXQUOTAS 2
>> +#define MAXQUOTAS 3
> Hum, actually this isn't so simple. MAXQUOTAS is used in several
> filesystems - ext3, ext4, ocfs2, reiserfs, gfs2 - and just bumping up
> MAXQUOTAS can have unexpected consequences for them (they won't have
> properly initialized data structures for new quota type). So what we have
> to do as a preparatory step is to make these filesystems define their own
> MAXQUOTAS value (like EXT3_MAXQUOTAS, ...). I'll take care of that.
Yeah, you are right. It is likely that a new MAXQUOTAS value will hurt other
file systems. And I saw your patch for it. I will use EXT4_MAXQUOTAS
in Ext4 instead.
However, the general codes in fs/quota or head files like quotaops.h use
MAXQUOTAS heavily too. I guess I have no better choice but replace
MAXQUOTAS there with a new macro, e.g. MAXQUOTAS_NEW (3). I will handle
the interfaces carefully so that they remain exactly the same semantics. Do you
have any better idea?
The reason why I replaced the sepcail type number (i.e. -1) with a bitmask is
that I thought there might be some cases when we want to operate on some
of the quota types rather than all of them. When the number of quota
types was 2,
-1 is alright. But since we are using 3 quota types, it becomes a
problem. In order
to keep the compatibility of quota interfaces, we need to pass only
QUOTA_USR_BIT | QUOTA_GRP_BIT to functions like __dquot_initialize().
But for ext4, we need to pass QUOTA_ALL_BIT. This is an important use case
which -1 quota type is not able to satisfy.
So, in general, I will:
1) keep MAXQUOTAS value as 2;
2) replace MAXQUOTAS in genral codes with MAXQUOTAS_NEW (3);
3) use EXT4_MAXQUOTAS in Ext4 codes.
Please let me know if you have any suggestions.
Regards,
- Li Xi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-16 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-10 3:52 [PATCH v3 1/4] quota: add project quota support Li Xi
2014-09-10 16:45 ` Jan Kara
2014-09-16 8:15 ` Li Xi [this message]
2014-09-16 19:58 ` Jan Kara
2014-09-17 3:02 ` Li Xi
2014-09-17 12:17 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPTn0cBXjePDOmT+dr4VOVs1r9sKbFC16pJv1fTc_oHLNYLsDA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=pkuelelixi@gmail.com \
--cc=adilger@dilger.ca \
--cc=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).