From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-f47.google.com ([209.85.218.47]:33513 "EHLO mail-oi0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750941AbcEISXF (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2016 14:23:05 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-f47.google.com with SMTP id v145so219954489oie.0 for ; Mon, 09 May 2016 11:23:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1462817565.27137.102.camel@hpe.com> References: <1462494596-20938-1-git-send-email-toshi.kani@hpe.com> <1462494596-20938-3-git-send-email-toshi.kani@hpe.com> <1462817565.27137.102.camel@hpe.com> Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 11:23:03 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] block: Add bdev_supports_dax() for dax mount checks From: Dan Williams To: Toshi Kani Cc: Jan Kara , david , Al Viro , Jens Axboe , Christoph Hellwig , Boaz Harrosh , "Theodore Ts'o" , Andreas Dilger , Ross Zwisler , micah.parrish@hpe.com, "linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" , linux-fsdevel , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Toshi Kani wrote: > On Sun, 2016-05-08 at 12:14 -0700, Dan Williams wrote: >> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Toshi Kani wrote: > : >> > +int bdev_supports_dax(struct super_block *sb, int blocksize) >> > +{ >> > + struct blk_dax_ctl dax = { >> > + .sector = 0, >> > + .size = PAGE_SIZE, >> > + }; >> > + int err; >> > + >> > + if (blocksize != PAGE_SIZE) { >> > + vfs_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "error: unsupported blocksize for >> > dax"); >> > + return -EINVAL; >> > + } >> > + >> > + err = bdev_direct_access(sb->s_bdev, &dax); >> > + if (err < 0) { >> > + switch (err) { >> > + case -EOPNOTSUPP: >> > + vfs_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, >> > + "error: device does not support dax"); >> > + break; >> > + case -EINVAL: >> > + vfs_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, >> > + "error: unaligned partition for dax"); >> > + break; >> > + default: >> > + vfs_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, >> > + "error: dax access failed (%d)", err); >> > + } >> > + return err; >> > + } >> > + >> > + return 0; >> > +} >> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bdev_supports_dax); >> >> This patch should replace blkdev_dax_capable(), or just reuse that >> existing routine, or am I missing something? > > Good question. bdev_supports_dax() is a helper function tailored for the > filesystem's mount -o dax case. While blkdev_dax_capable() is similar, it > does not need error messages like "device does not support dax" since it > implicitly enables dax when capable. So, I think we can keep > blkdev_dax_capable(), but change it to call bdev_direct_access() so that > actual check is performed in a single place. Sounds good to me.