linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
	Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6 v3] dax: Page invalidation fixes
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 10:57:23 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4giLyY8pWP09V5BmUM+sfGO-VJCtkfV6L-RFS+0XQsT9Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161213115209.GG15362@quack2.suse.cz>

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 3:52 AM, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
> On Mon 12-12-16 17:47:02, Jan Kara wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> this is the third revision of my fixes of races when invalidating hole pages in
>> DAX mappings. See changelogs for details. The series is based on my patches to
>> write-protect DAX PTEs which are currently carried in mm tree. This is a hard
>> dependency because we really need to closely track dirtiness (and cleanness!)
>> of radix tree entries in DAX mappings in order to avoid discarding valid dirty
>> bits leading to missed cache flushes on fsync(2).
>>
>> The tests have passed xfstests for xfs and ext4 in DAX and non-DAX mode.
>>
>> Johannes, are you OK with patch 2/6 in its current form? I'd like to push these
>> patches to some tree once DAX write-protection patches are merged.  I'm hoping
>> to get at least first three patches merged for 4.10-rc2... Thanks!
>
> OK, with the final ack from Johannes and since this is mostly DAX stuff,
> can we take this through NVDIMM tree and push to Linus either late in the
> merge window or for -rc2? These patches require my DAX patches sitting in mm
> tree so they can be included in any git tree only once those patches land
> in Linus' tree (which may happen only once Dave and Ted push out their
> stuff - this is the most convoluted merge window I'd ever to deal with ;-)...
> Dan?
>

I like the -rc2 plan better than sending a pull request based on some
random point in the middle of the merge window. I can give Linus a
heads up in my initial nvdimm pull request for -rc1 that for
coordination purposes we'll be sending this set of follow-on DAX
cleanups for -rc2.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-13 18:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-12 16:47 [PATCH 0/6 v3] dax: Page invalidation fixes Jan Kara
2016-12-12 16:47 ` [PATCH 1/6] ext2: Return BH_New buffers for zeroed blocks Jan Kara
2016-12-12 16:47 ` [PATCH 2/6] mm: Invalidate DAX radix tree entries only if appropriate Jan Kara
2016-12-12 17:50   ` Johannes Weiner
2016-12-12 16:47 ` [PATCH 3/6] dax: Avoid page invalidation races and unnecessary radix tree traversals Jan Kara
2016-12-12 16:47 ` [PATCH 4/6] dax: Finish fault completely when loading holes Jan Kara
2016-12-12 16:47 ` [PATCH 5/6] dax: Call ->iomap_begin without entry lock during dax fault Jan Kara
2016-12-12 16:47 ` [PATCH 6/6] ext4: Simplify DAX fault path Jan Kara
2016-12-12 17:51 ` [PATCH 0/6 v3] dax: Page invalidation fixes Johannes Weiner
2016-12-13 11:52 ` Jan Kara
2016-12-13 18:57   ` Dan Williams [this message]
2016-12-17  1:35     ` Dan Williams
2016-12-17  1:49       ` Dan Williams
2016-12-19  9:56       ` Jan Kara
2016-12-19 21:51         ` Dan Williams
2016-12-20  7:59           ` Jan Kara
2016-12-20 20:09             ` Dan Williams
2016-12-13 20:01   ` Dave Chinner
2016-12-13 20:42   ` Theodore Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAPcyv4giLyY8pWP09V5BmUM+sfGO-VJCtkfV6L-RFS+0XQsT9Q@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).