From: Matt Ochs <mochs@nvidia.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: Bernd Schubert <bschubert@ddn.com>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fuse: back uncached readdir buffers with pages
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 19:24:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D14CFB43-C7D8-4F3E-920B-E2A3B925E6B3@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJfpegtcsWnXh-uDh1Qu83dFF9nJji1gytk2y9Wk5p9+JDTZ+w@mail.gmail.com>
> On Apr 29, 2026, at 02:27, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2026 at 01:30, Matthew R. Ochs <mochs@nvidia.com> wrote:
>
>> The larger buffer is also currently supplied as a kvec output argument.
>> For virtiofs, kvec arguments are copied through req->argbuf, which is
>> allocated with kmalloc(..., GFP_ATOMIC). A large readdir buffer can
>> therefore require a multi-megabyte contiguous atomic allocation and fail
>> with -ENOMEM.
>
> Shouldn't this be max_read? Here "read" and "write" refer to
> direction of I/O on the filesystem, not on the fuse device (see
> fuse/file.c)
Thanks, the read/write direction point makes sense.
I tested changing the cap to fc->max_read only, but that reproduces the
original virtiofs failure on the 4K-host/64K-guest setup. The runtime
values for the failing READDIR are:
PAGE_SIZE=65536
fc->max_pages=124
fc->max_read=4294967295
fc->max_write=1048576
max_bufsize=8126464
nr_pages=124
So for this virtiofs mount, fc->max_read is effectively unlimited, while
virtiofsd advertises its 1 MiB MAX_BUFFER_SIZE through max_write and
rejects READDIR sizes above that limit.
Do you prefer handling this locally in fuse_readdir_uncached(), for
example by capping the request with all available limits:
min3_t(size_t, fc->max_pages << PAGE_SHIFT, fc->max_read, fc->max_write)
Or should virtiofs/FUSE instead make fc->max_read reflect this byte-sized
buffer limit before readdir uses it?
I will address the other cleanup comments in v3: drop the cast, keep the
clamp-style sizing, use release_pages(), and remove the nomem double jump.
-matt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-30 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-28 23:29 [PATCH v2] fuse: back uncached readdir buffers with pages Matthew R. Ochs
2026-04-29 7:27 ` Miklos Szeredi
2026-04-30 19:24 ` Matt Ochs [this message]
2026-04-29 9:29 ` Bernd Schubert
2026-04-29 10:38 ` Miklos Szeredi
2026-04-29 10:47 ` Bernd Schubert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D14CFB43-C7D8-4F3E-920B-E2A3B925E6B3@nvidia.com \
--to=mochs@nvidia.com \
--cc=bschubert@ddn.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox