From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Theodore Tso Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] xfstests: add fiemap operation to fsstress Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 06:54:16 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1319849297-3506-1-git-send-email-dmonakhov@openvz.org> <1319849297-3506-7-git-send-email-dmonakhov@openvz.org> <20111102195534.GB22500@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Theodore Tso , Dmitry Monakhov , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, aelder@sgi.com, hch@lst.de, xfs@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Received: from DMZ-MAILSEC-SCANNER-6.MIT.EDU ([18.7.68.35]:55341 "EHLO dmz-mailsec-scanner-6.mit.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752656Ab1KCK7X convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2011 06:59:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20111102195534.GB22500@infradead.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Nov 2, 2011, at 3:55 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Alex, Eric, Dave - should we add new tests with the new operations > Dmitry added, or is adding new ops to the existing tests fine? One argument for adding new ops to existing tests is that it makes the = run time of the entire test suite take longer. A QA pass is already t= aking quite a while, and it would be nice if we could keep xfstests as = efficient as possible in terms of the maximum testing coverage per time= spent running the test suite=85. -- Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel= " in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html