From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 20:38:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <20040826150202.GE5733@mail.shareable.org> <200408282314.i7SNErYv003270@localhost.localdomain> <20040901200806.GC31934@mail.shareable.org> <20040902002431.GN31934@mail.shareable.org> <413694E6.7010606@slaphack.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Jamie Lokier , Horst von Brand , Adrian Bunk , Hans Reiser , viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk, Christoph Hellwig , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Lyamin aka FLX , ReiserFS List Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com To: David Masover In-Reply-To: <413694E6.7010606@slaphack.com> List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, David Masover wrote: > > And that is the right solution. Not the only one, but the right one. > Caching isn't the only thing sorely in need of transaction support right > now. Actually, I find it hard to think of anything on Linux which > shouldn't have transactions -- why should /etc/fstab or > /home/david/homework be more fragile than /var/lib/mysql? It's easy to talk big. It's damn hard to _implement_ a complex system, and make it stable and bug-free, and support legacy applications. There is a reason why we do only what _must_ be done in kernel space. Linus