linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cam.ac.uk>
To: Martin Jambor <jamborm@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bug in block_write_full_page (fs/buffer.c)?
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 23:55:57 +0100 (BST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0506062351320.7523@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8e70aacf05060613022b1466ff@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Martin Jambor wrote:
> when block_write_full_page (fs/buffer.c) is called and the page is
> fully outside the i_size, the function does not call
> end_page_writeback() even though Documentation/filesystems/Locking
> explicitly says that any implementation of aops->writepage must do so
> in any case.
> 
> "If no I/O is submitted, the filesystem must run end_page_writeback()
> against the page before returning from writepage."
> 
> Is this a bug, is the documentation wrong or is it just me?

Just you.  (-;

The sentence you quote applies only once set_page_writeback() has been 
run which it hasn't in this case.

But this is beside the point.  The point is that the code path you are 
concerned about calls block_invalidatepage() which ends up calling 
clear_page_dirty() for the kind of page we are discussing which in turn 
clears the radix tree dirty tag so all is dandy.

Best regards,

	Anton
-- 
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @)
Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK
Linux NTFS maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.freenode.net
WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ & http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/

      reply	other threads:[~2005-06-06 22:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <8e70aacf05060519472206605e@mail.gmail.com>
2005-06-06 20:02 ` Bug in block_write_full_page (fs/buffer.c)? Martin Jambor
2005-06-06 22:55   ` Anton Altaparmakov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.60.0506062351320.7523@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk \
    --to=aia21@cam.ac.uk \
    --cc=jamborm@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).