From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roman Zippel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Full NLS support for HFS (classic) filesystem Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 16:44:59 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <429B1E35.2040905@rambler.ru> <429C68A0.20003@rambler.ru> <429CBC75.2030605@rambler.ru> <429CD545.1070308@rambler.ru> <1117550958.8073.30.camel@imp.csi.cam.ac.uk> <429F0AF1.5060705@rambler.ru> <1117704266.11696.5.camel@imp.csi.cam.ac.uk> <42A05C6E.3000301@rambler.ru> <42A44C8A.2000906@rambler.ru> <42A4C3B6.8080006@rambler.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from scrub.xs4all.nl ([194.109.195.176]:2741 "EHLO scrub.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261399AbVFFOpI (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2005 10:45:08 -0400 To: Pavel Fedin In-Reply-To: <42A4C3B6.8080006@rambler.ru> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Hi, On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Pavel Fedin wrote: > Well, it's really bad that you say so IMHO. But it's just my opinion. In > fact, i agree, probably i'm alone who uses HFS in Russia so this is only my > problem and you don't want to take care about the minority of users. Could you please stop this nonsense? You have two perfectly valid alternatives, so you have to come up with something better, why you want to insist on your prefered solution. bye, Roman