From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/8] share/private/slave a subtree
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 14:19:08 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0507081412280.3743@scrub.home>
References: <1120816072.30164.10.camel@localhost>  <1120816229.30164.13.camel@localhost>
  <1120817463.30164.43.camel@localhost> <84144f0205070804171d7c9726@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: Ram <linuxram@us.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, mike@waychison.com,
	bfields@fieldses.org, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+glk-linux-kernel=40m.gmane.org-S262595AbVGHMTf@vger.kernel.org>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <84144f0205070804171d7c9726@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

Hi,

On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Pekka Enberg wrote:

> > +#define PNODE_MEMBER_VFS  0x01
> > +#define PNODE_SLAVE_VFS   0x02
> 
> Enums, please.

Is this becoming a requirement now? I personally would rather leave that 
to personal preference...

bye, Roman