From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Szabolcs Szakacsits Subject: Re: Btrfs v0.16 released Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 22:26:04 +0300 (MET DST) Message-ID: References: <1217962876.15342.33.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> <1218100464.8625.9.camel@twins> <1218105597.15342.189.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> <877ias66v4.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <1218221293.15342.263.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> <1218747656.15342.439.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> <20080814211756.GC13814@one.firstfloor.org> <1218763554.15342.460.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> <20080815013934.GE19125@one.firstfloor.org> <1218805256.15342.484.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linux-btrfs , linux-kernel , linux-fsdevel To: Chris Mason Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1218805256.15342.484.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, Chris Mason wrote: > Ext3 and XFS score somewhere between 10-15MB/s on the same test... Interesting (and cool animations). We tried compilebench (-i 30 -r 0) just for fun using kernel 2.6.26, freshly formatted partition, with defaults. Results: MB/s Runtime (s) ----- ----------- ext3 13.24 877 btrfs 12.33 793 ntfs-3g 8.55 865 reiserfs 8.38 966 xfs 1.88 3901 Regards, Szaka -- NTFS-3G: http://ntfs-3g.org