From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3 Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 13:31:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <44898EE3.6080903@garzik.org> <448992EB.5070405@garzik.org> <20060609181020.GB5964@schatzie.adilger.int> <20060609201643.GG5964@schatzie.adilger.int> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Andrew Morton , Jeff Garzik , ext2-devel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cmm@us.ibm.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Alex Tomas Return-path: To: Andreas Dilger In-Reply-To: <20060609201643.GG5964@schatzie.adilger.int> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ext2-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: ext2-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, Andreas Dilger wrote: > > It's funny that everyone is arguing to fork ext3 into ext4, for a feature > that will primarily allow it to work with large disks (that are already > here, not some wacky pipe dream of featuritis as Jeff thinks). Yet the > same people that are advocating code duplication on a massive scale in > ext4 are against 5 lines of duplication between the VFS and a filesystem, > or in a couple of drivers here and there. You haven't actually listened to any of the arguments, have you? Please remove me from the Cc on this thread. I'm not interested. Linus