From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 20:41:35 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0606092040430.17380@d.namei>
References: <1149816055.4066.60.camel@dyn9047017069.beaverton.ibm.com>
	<4488E1A4.20305@garzik.org>
	<20060609083523.GQ5964@schatzie.adilger.int>
	<44898EE3.6080903@garzik.org> <448992EB.5070405@garzik.org>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0606090836160.5498@g5.osdl.org>
	<448997FA.50109@garzik.org>
	<m3irnacohp.fsf@bzzz.home.net>  <44899A1C.7000207@garzik.org>
	<1149886363.5776.109.camel@sisko.sctweedie.blueyonder.co.uk>
	<4489EC6B.4010200@garzik.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	"Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>,
	"ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" <ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alex Tomas <alex@clusterfs.com>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>
Return-path: <ext2-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
In-Reply-To: <4489EC6B.4010200@garzik.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ext2-devel>,
	<mailto:ext2-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=ext2-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:ext2-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ext2-devel>,
	<mailto:ext2-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ext2-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: ext2-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, Jeff Garzik wrote:

> Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 11:56 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > 
> > > Think about how this will be deployed in production, long term.
> > > 
> > > If extents are not made default at some point, then no one will use the
> > > feature, and it should not be merged.
> > 
> > Features such as ACLs and SELinux are still not on by default and are
> > most *definitely* used.  This is a bogus argument.
> 
> They are on in SElinux-enabled distro installs, AFAIK?

In RHEL & FC, SELinux xattrs are enabled by default, and acls need to be 
enabled via a mount option.


-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>