linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Amit Gud <gud@cis.ksu.edu>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>, Kalpak Shah <kalpak@linsyssoft.com>,
	Karuna sagar K <karunasagark@gmail.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ChunkFS - measuring cross-chunk references
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:38:01 -0500 (CDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704232031040.10676@camaro.cis.ksu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704232014571.10676@camaro.cis.ksu.edu>

On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Amit Gud wrote:

> On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
>> 
>> >  The other thing which we should consider is that chunkfs really
>> >  requires a 64-bit inode number space, which means either we only allow
>>
>>  does it?
>>  I'd think it needs a "chunk space" number and a 32 bit local inode
>>  number ;) (same for blocks)
>> 
>
> For inodes, yes, either 64-bit inode or some field for the chunk id in which 
> the inode is. But for block numbers, you don't. Because individual chunks 
> manage part of the whole file system in an independent way. They have their 
> block bitmaps starting at an offset. Inode bitmaps, however, remains same.
>

In that sense, we also can do away without having chunk identifier encoded 
into inode number and chunkfs would still be fine with it. But we will 
then loose inode uniqueness property, which could well be OK as it is with 
other file systems in which inode number is not sufficient for unique 
identification of an inode.


AG
--
May the source be with you.
http://www.cis.ksu.edu/~gud

  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-24  1:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-22 20:35 ChunkFS - measuring cross-chunk references Karuna sagar K
2007-04-22 16:27 ` Amit Gud
2007-04-23  7:19   ` Karuna sagar K
2007-04-23  9:34     ` Kalpak Shah
2007-04-23 20:53       ` Andreas Dilger
2007-04-24  0:13         ` Theodore Tso
2007-04-24  1:02           ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-04-24  1:24             ` Amit Gud
2007-04-24  1:38               ` Amit Gud [this message]
2007-04-24 15:07             ` Theodore Tso
2007-04-25  0:17           ` Karuna sagar K
2007-04-25  0:20             ` Karuna sagar K
2007-04-25 10:23               ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2007-05-19 22:49                 ` Karuna sagar K
2007-05-07  5:18           ` Valerie Henson
2007-05-07  1:09         ` Valerie Henson
2007-05-07  1:09 ` Valerie Henson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0704232031040.10676@camaro.cis.ksu.edu \
    --to=gud@cis.ksu.edu \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=kalpak@linsyssoft.com \
    --cc=karunasagark@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).