From: david@lang.hm
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Jeff Zheng <Jeff.Zheng@endace.com>,
Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: Software raid0 will crash the file-system, when each disk is 5TB
Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 21:45:41 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705162145060.31624@asgard.lang.hm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17995.49602.427417.500049@notabene.brown>
On Thu, 17 May 2007, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Thursday May 17, Jeff.Zheng@endace.com wrote:
>>
>>> The only difference of any significance between the working
>>> and non-working configurations is that in the non-working,
>>> the component devices are larger than 2Gig, and hence have
>>> sector offsets greater than 32 bits.
>>
>> Do u mean 2T here?, but in both configuartion, the component devices are
>> larger than 2T (2.25T&5.5T).
>
> Yes, I meant 2T, and yes, the components are always over 2T.
2T decimal or 2T binary?
> So I'm
> at a complete loss. The raid0 code follows the same paths and does
> the same things and uses 64bit arithmetic where needed.
>
> So I have no idea how there could be a difference between these two
> cases.
>
> I'm at a loss...
>
> NeilBrown
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-17 4:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-15 23:09 Software raid0 will crash the file-system, when each disk is 5TB Jeff Zheng
2007-05-15 23:29 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-05-16 0:03 ` Neil Brown
2007-05-16 1:56 ` Jeff Zheng
2007-05-16 17:28 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-05-16 17:58 ` david
2007-05-17 0:48 ` Neil Brown
2007-05-17 2:09 ` Jeff Zheng
2007-05-17 2:45 ` Neil Brown
2007-05-17 3:11 ` Jeff Zheng
2007-05-17 4:32 ` Neil Brown
2007-05-17 5:08 ` Jeff Zheng
2007-05-17 4:45 ` david [this message]
2007-05-17 5:03 ` Neil Brown
2007-05-17 5:31 ` Neil Brown
2007-05-17 5:38 ` Jeff Zheng
2007-05-17 22:55 ` Jeff Zheng
2007-05-18 0:21 ` Neil Brown
2007-05-22 21:31 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-05-16 14:04 ` Andreas Dilger
2007-05-16 18:04 ` david
2007-05-16 18:16 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-16 21:42 ` Jeff Zheng
2007-05-17 7:21 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-17 11:11 ` Neil Brown
2007-05-17 15:30 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-16 21:44 ` Jeff Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0705162145060.31624@asgard.lang.hm \
--to=david@lang.hm \
--cc=Jeff.Zheng@endace.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).