From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [RFC 13/26] SLUB: Add SlabReclaimable() to avoid repeated reclaim attempts Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:00:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <20070901014107.719506437@sgi.com> <20070901014222.303468369@sgi.com> <46F13B6C.7020501@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Andy Whitcroft , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Mel Gorman , David Chinner To: Rik van Riel Return-path: Received: from netops-testserver-4-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.29]:54877 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751131AbXISSAy (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:00:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <46F13B6C.7020501@redhat.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, Rik van Riel wrote: > Why is it safe to not use the normal page flag bit operators > for these page flags operations? Because SLUB always modifies page flags under PageLock.