From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [patch 2/4] ext2: fix rec_len overflow for 64KB block size Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:27:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <20070925233049.656803267@sgi.com> <20070925233500.695970654@sgi.com> <20070926004245.GS32520@schatzie.adilger.int> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Mingming Cao , Takashi Sato , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz To: Andreas Dilger Return-path: Received: from netops-testserver-3-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.28]:53312 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757687AbXIZR1t (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:27:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070926004245.GS32520@schatzie.adilger.int> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Andreas Dilger wrote: > On Sep 25, 2007 16:30 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > [2/4] ext2: fix rec_len overflow > > - prevent rec_len from overflow with 64KB blocksize > > > > Signed-off-by: Takashi Sato > > Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter > > Note that we just got a cleaner implemantation of this code on the ext4 > mailing list from Jan Kara yesterday. Please use that one instead, in > thread "Avoid rec_len overflow with 64KB block size" instead. Yes that looks much better. He is missing the first patch that changes the constants. How can we get the 4 patches (the constant change and Jan's changes to ext 2 3 4 merged?