From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: More Large blocksize benchmarks Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:44:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <20071016002231.GA21378@think.oraclecorp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: David Chinner , Linus Torvalds , Nathan Scott , Andrea Arcangeli , Nick Piggin , Mel Gorman , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , William Lee Irwin III , Jens Axboe , Badari Pulavarty , Maxim Levitsky , Fengguang Wu , swin wang , totty.lu@gmail.com, hugh@veritas.com, joern@lazybastard.org To: Chris Mason Return-path: Received: from netops-testserver-4-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.29]:55059 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757276AbXJPAoQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Oct 2007 20:44:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20071016002231.GA21378@think.oraclecorp.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Chris Mason wrote: > Dave reported that XFS saw much higher write throughput with large > blocksizes, but so far I'm seeing the most benefits during reads. Dave's tests were done with an early large blocksize patchset that had issues with readahead. More recent versions have the fixes by Fengguang that address the issue.