From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [patch 01/19] Define functions for page cache handling Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:23:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: References: <20071129011052.866354847@sgi.com> <20071129011144.503535436@sgi.com> <396325866.00706@ustc.edu.cn> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Christoph Hellwig , Mel Gorman , William Lee Irwin III , David Chinner , Jens Axboe , Badari Pulavarty , Maxim Levitsky , Fengguang Wu , swin wang , totty.lu@gmail.com, hugh@veritas.com, joern@lazybastard.org To: Fengguang Wu Return-path: Received: from netops-testserver-3-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.28]:41370 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761736AbXK2TYE (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:24:04 -0500 In-Reply-To: <396325866.00706@ustc.edu.cn> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Fengguang Wu wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 05:10:53PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > +static inline loff_t page_cache_mask(struct address_space *a) > > +{ > > + return (loff_t)PAGE_MASK; > > +} > > A tiny question: Why choose loff_t instead of 'unsigned long'? > > It's not obvious because page_cache_mask() is not referenced in this > patchset at all ;-) Ok Then lets drop page_cache_mask completely.