From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [patch 21/21] slab defrag: Obsolete SLAB Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 11:05:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <20080510030831.796641881@sgi.com> <20080510030919.604216074@sgi.com> <4825709A.2020407@firstfloor.org> <20080510221515.3540a6cc@bree.surriel.com> <2f11576a0805120038s334dc56cuaf16b8b7c6f87098@mail.gmail.com> <84144f020805120054t1370236ei5ff52279457e026e@mail.gmail.com> <482B2617.5010605@firstfloor.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Pekka Enberg , KOSAKI Motohiro , Rik van Riel , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Mel Gorman , mpm@selenic.com, Matthew Wilcox , "Zhang, Yanmin" To: Andi Kleen Return-path: Received: from relay2.sgi.com ([192.48.171.30]:35577 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755412AbYENSFP (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2008 14:05:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: <482B2617.5010605@firstfloor.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 14 May 2008, Andi Kleen wrote: > Ignoring NUMA is no option unfortunately. And with integrated memory > controller many of the remote CPU frees are off node. The issue of object expiration holdoffs also affects applications running on pure SMP systems.