linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org,
	viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 06/14] hfsplus: remove hfsplus_permission()
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 22:35:23 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0805212232500.18302@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080521171549.964767446@szeredi.hu>

Hi,

On Wed, 21 May 2008, Miklos Szeredi wrote:

> From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
> 
> I'm not sure what this function is trying to achieve, but it's not
> succeeding: the condition for which it is returning zero is exactly
> the same as checked by permission(), which results in -EACCES.
> 
> So in the end this is equivalent to the default action.

No, it's not, it allows for HFS+ specific special case to allow the lookup 
of the resource fork.

bye, Roman

  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-21 20:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-21 17:14 [patch 00/14] vfs: permission API cleanup Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-21 17:14 ` [patch 01/14] vfs: add path_getxattr() Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-21 17:15 ` [patch 02/14] vfs: add path_listxattr() Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-21 17:15 ` [patch 03/14] hppfs: remove hppfs_permission Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-23  9:17   ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-21 17:15 ` [patch 04/14] gfs2: dont call permission() Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-23  9:12   ` Steven Whitehouse
2008-05-23  9:30     ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-23  9:32     ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-23  9:18   ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-23  9:48     ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-23 10:00       ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-25 19:24         ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-23 10:18       ` Steven Whitehouse
2008-05-23 11:01         ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-25 19:23       ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-21 17:15 ` [patch 05/14] hpfs: " Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-23  9:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-21 17:15 ` [patch 06/14] hfsplus: remove hfsplus_permission() Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-21 20:35   ` Roman Zippel [this message]
2008-05-22  7:58     ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-22 12:02       ` Roman Zippel
2008-05-22 12:17         ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-22 12:28           ` Roman Zippel
2008-05-22 12:37             ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-23  9:21               ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-23 15:18                 ` Roman Zippel
2008-05-23 15:31                   ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-23 15:49                     ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-23 16:30                       ` Roman Zippel
2008-05-23 18:02                         ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-23 18:33                           ` Roman Zippel
2008-05-23 19:05                             ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-23 21:52                               ` Roman Zippel
2008-05-24  6:59                                 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-23 15:11               ` Roman Zippel
2008-05-21 17:15 ` [patch 07/14] vfs: pass dentry to permission() Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-21 20:29   ` Al Viro
2008-05-22  7:00     ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-22  7:12       ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-21 17:15 ` [patch 08/14] vfs: cleanup i_op->permission() Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-21 17:15 ` [patch 09/14] security: dont pass nameidata to security_inode_permission() Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-21 22:52   ` James Morris
2008-05-21 17:15 ` [patch 10/14] vfs: pass flags to dentry_permission() Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-21 17:15 ` [patch 11/14] vfs: move executable checking into ->permission() Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-21 18:16   ` Trond Myklebust
2008-05-21 19:09     ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-21 19:26       ` Trond Myklebust
2008-05-21 19:34         ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-23  9:26   ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-23  9:52     ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-21 17:15 ` [patch 12/14] vfs: create path_permission() Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-21 17:15 ` [patch 13/14] vfs: dont use dentry_permission() Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-21 17:15 ` [patch 14/14] vfs: path_permission() clean up flags Miklos Szeredi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0805212232500.18302@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).