From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org,
viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 06/14] hfsplus: remove hfsplus_permission()
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 14:28:19 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0805221427300.18302@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1Jz9jk-0007rg-5W@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Hi,
On Thu, 22 May 2008, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > That check didn't used to be there and that the HFS+ check is older than
> > that might have given you the idea that it at least used to work.
> > So now the only way for a fs to differentiate between lookup and exec is
> > gone... :-(
>
> That check was added quite some time ago:
>
> commit a343bb7750e6a098909c34f5c5dfddbc4fa40053
> Author: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
> Date: Tue Aug 22 20:06:03 2006 -0400
>
> VFS: Fix access("file", X_OK) in the presence of ACLs
>
> Also it sounds just plain wrong to allow execution without an x bit.
> It could cause nasty surprises at least. What was the intended
> purpose of that code, and why did nobody notice when it stopped
> working?
As I said to allow lookup on files.
bye, Roman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-22 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-21 17:14 [patch 00/14] vfs: permission API cleanup Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-21 17:14 ` [patch 01/14] vfs: add path_getxattr() Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-21 17:15 ` [patch 02/14] vfs: add path_listxattr() Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-21 17:15 ` [patch 03/14] hppfs: remove hppfs_permission Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-23 9:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-21 17:15 ` [patch 04/14] gfs2: dont call permission() Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-23 9:12 ` Steven Whitehouse
2008-05-23 9:30 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-23 9:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-23 9:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-23 9:48 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-23 10:00 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-25 19:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-23 10:18 ` Steven Whitehouse
2008-05-23 11:01 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-25 19:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-21 17:15 ` [patch 05/14] hpfs: " Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-23 9:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-21 17:15 ` [patch 06/14] hfsplus: remove hfsplus_permission() Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-21 20:35 ` Roman Zippel
2008-05-22 7:58 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-22 12:02 ` Roman Zippel
2008-05-22 12:17 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-22 12:28 ` Roman Zippel [this message]
2008-05-22 12:37 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-23 9:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-23 15:18 ` Roman Zippel
2008-05-23 15:31 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-23 15:49 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-23 16:30 ` Roman Zippel
2008-05-23 18:02 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-23 18:33 ` Roman Zippel
2008-05-23 19:05 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-23 21:52 ` Roman Zippel
2008-05-24 6:59 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-23 15:11 ` Roman Zippel
2008-05-21 17:15 ` [patch 07/14] vfs: pass dentry to permission() Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-21 20:29 ` Al Viro
2008-05-22 7:00 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-22 7:12 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-21 17:15 ` [patch 08/14] vfs: cleanup i_op->permission() Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-21 17:15 ` [patch 09/14] security: dont pass nameidata to security_inode_permission() Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-21 22:52 ` James Morris
2008-05-21 17:15 ` [patch 10/14] vfs: pass flags to dentry_permission() Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-21 17:15 ` [patch 11/14] vfs: move executable checking into ->permission() Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-21 18:16 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-05-21 19:09 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-21 19:26 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-05-21 19:34 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-23 9:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-23 9:52 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-21 17:15 ` [patch 12/14] vfs: create path_permission() Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-21 17:15 ` [patch 13/14] vfs: dont use dentry_permission() Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-21 17:15 ` [patch 14/14] vfs: path_permission() clean up flags Miklos Szeredi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0805221427300.18302@localhost.localdomain \
--to=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).