linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Joe Malicki <jmalicki@metacarta.com>,
	Michael Itz <mitz@metacarta.com>,
	Kenneth Baker <bakerk@metacarta.com>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] fix setuid sometimes wouldn't
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 23:21:27 +0000 (GMT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0903282320271.15432@blonde.anvils> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0903282307050.14892@blonde.anvils>

check_unsafe_exec() also notes whether the fs_struct is being
shared by more threads than will get killed by the exec, and if so
sets LSM_UNSAFE_SHARE to make bprm_set_creds() careful about euid.
But /proc/<pid>/cwd and /proc/<pid>/root lookups make transient
use of get_fs_struct(), which also raises that sharing count.

This might occasionally cause a setuid program not to change euid,
in the same way as happened with files->count (check_unsafe_exec
also looks at sighand->count, but /proc doesn't raise that one).

We'd prefer exec not to unshare fs_struct: so fix this in procfs,
replacing get_fs_struct() by get_fs_path(), which does path_get
while still holding task_lock, instead of raising fs->count.

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
___

 fs/proc/base.c |   50 +++++++++++++++--------------------------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

--- 2.6.29/fs/proc/base.c	2009-03-23 23:12:14.000000000 +0000
+++ linux/fs/proc/base.c	2009-03-28 18:06:02.000000000 +0000
@@ -146,15 +146,22 @@ static unsigned int pid_entry_count_dirs
 	return count;
 }
 
-static struct fs_struct *get_fs_struct(struct task_struct *task)
+static int get_fs_path(struct task_struct *task, struct path *path, bool root)
 {
 	struct fs_struct *fs;
+	int result = -ENOENT;
+
 	task_lock(task);
 	fs = task->fs;
-	if(fs)
-		atomic_inc(&fs->count);
+	if (fs) {
+		read_lock(&fs->lock);
+		*path = root ? fs->root : fs->pwd;
+		path_get(path);
+		read_unlock(&fs->lock);
+		result = 0;
+	}
 	task_unlock(task);
-	return fs;
+	return result;
 }
 
 static int get_nr_threads(struct task_struct *tsk)
@@ -172,42 +179,24 @@ static int get_nr_threads(struct task_st
 static int proc_cwd_link(struct inode *inode, struct path *path)
 {
 	struct task_struct *task = get_proc_task(inode);
-	struct fs_struct *fs = NULL;
 	int result = -ENOENT;
 
 	if (task) {
-		fs = get_fs_struct(task);
+		result = get_fs_path(task, path, 0);
 		put_task_struct(task);
 	}
-	if (fs) {
-		read_lock(&fs->lock);
-		*path = fs->pwd;
-		path_get(&fs->pwd);
-		read_unlock(&fs->lock);
-		result = 0;
-		put_fs_struct(fs);
-	}
 	return result;
 }
 
 static int proc_root_link(struct inode *inode, struct path *path)
 {
 	struct task_struct *task = get_proc_task(inode);
-	struct fs_struct *fs = NULL;
 	int result = -ENOENT;
 
 	if (task) {
-		fs = get_fs_struct(task);
+		result = get_fs_path(task, path, 1);
 		put_task_struct(task);
 	}
-	if (fs) {
-		read_lock(&fs->lock);
-		*path = fs->root;
-		path_get(&fs->root);
-		read_unlock(&fs->lock);
-		result = 0;
-		put_fs_struct(fs);
-	}
 	return result;
 }
 
@@ -596,7 +585,6 @@ static int mounts_open_common(struct ino
 	struct task_struct *task = get_proc_task(inode);
 	struct nsproxy *nsp;
 	struct mnt_namespace *ns = NULL;
-	struct fs_struct *fs = NULL;
 	struct path root;
 	struct proc_mounts *p;
 	int ret = -EINVAL;
@@ -610,22 +598,16 @@ static int mounts_open_common(struct ino
 				get_mnt_ns(ns);
 		}
 		rcu_read_unlock();
-		if (ns)
-			fs = get_fs_struct(task);
+		if (ns && get_fs_path(task, &root, 1) == 0)
+			ret = 0;
 		put_task_struct(task);
 	}
 
 	if (!ns)
 		goto err;
-	if (!fs)
+	if (ret)
 		goto err_put_ns;
 
-	read_lock(&fs->lock);
-	root = fs->root;
-	path_get(&root);
-	read_unlock(&fs->lock);
-	put_fs_struct(fs);
-
 	ret = -ENOMEM;
 	p = kmalloc(sizeof(struct proc_mounts), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!p)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-03-28 23:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-28 23:16 [PATCH 1/4] compat_do_execve should unshare_files Hugh Dickins
2009-03-28 23:20 ` [PATCH 2/4] fix setuid sometimes doesn't Hugh Dickins
2009-03-29  0:53   ` Q: check_unsafe_exec() races (Was: [PATCH 2/4] fix setuid sometimes doesn't) Oleg Nesterov
2009-03-29  4:10     ` Al Viro
2009-03-29  4:14       ` Al Viro
2009-03-29  4:52       ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-03-29  5:55         ` Al Viro
2009-03-29  6:01           ` Al Viro
2009-03-29 21:36             ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-03-29 22:20               ` Al Viro
2009-03-29 23:56                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-03-30  0:03                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-03-30  1:08                     ` Al Viro
2009-03-30  1:13                       ` Al Viro
2009-03-30  1:36                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-03-30  1:40                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-03-30 12:31                             ` Al Viro
2009-03-30 14:32                               ` Hugh Dickins
2009-03-31  6:16                                 ` Al Viro
2009-04-01  0:28                                   ` Hugh Dickins
2009-04-01  2:38                                     ` Al Viro
2009-04-01  3:03                                       ` Al Viro
2009-04-01 11:25                                         ` Hugh Dickins
2009-04-06 15:31                                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-04-19 16:30                                           ` Hugh Dickins
2009-04-21 16:10                                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-04-21 16:31                                               ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-21 17:15                                                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-04-21 17:35                                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-21 19:39                                                     ` Hugh Dickins
2009-04-23 23:01                                                       ` [PATCH 1/2] do_execve() must not clear fs->in_exec if it was set by another thread Oleg Nesterov
2009-04-23 23:18                                                         ` Roland McGrath
2009-04-23 23:31                                                         ` Al Viro
2009-04-24 11:57                                                           ` [PATCH 3/2] check_unsafe_exec: rcu_read_unlock Hugh Dickins
2009-04-24 14:34                                                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-04-24  4:20                                                         ` [PATCH 1/2] do_execve() must not clear fs->in_exec if it was set by another thread Hugh Dickins
2009-04-23 23:02                                                       ` [PATCH 2/2] check_unsafe_exec: s/lock_task_sighand/rcu_read_lock/ Oleg Nesterov
2009-04-23 23:18                                                         ` Roland McGrath
2009-04-24  4:29                                                         ` Hugh Dickins
2009-04-01 11:18                                       ` Q: check_unsafe_exec() races (Was: [PATCH 2/4] fix setuid sometimes doesn't) Hugh Dickins
2009-04-06 15:51                                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-04-19 16:44                                         ` Hugh Dickins
2009-04-21 16:39                                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-03-30 23:45                               ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-03-31  6:19                                 ` Al Viro
2009-03-28 23:21 ` Hugh Dickins [this message]
2009-03-29 11:19   ` [PATCH 3/4] fix setuid sometimes wouldn't Alexey Dobriyan
2009-03-29 21:48     ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-03-29 22:37       ` Al Viro
2009-03-28 23:23 ` [PATCH 4/4] Annotate struct fs_struct's usage count restriction Hugh Dickins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0903282320271.15432@blonde.anvils \
    --to=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bakerk@metacarta.com \
    --cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=jmalicki@metacarta.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mitz@metacarta.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).