From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
To: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] fix bmap-vs-truncate race
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:20:24 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0903301518120.23576@hs20-bc2-1.build.redhat.com> (raw)
Hi
I'm submitting this patch for 2.6.30 merge window.
FAT filesystem used down_read(&mapping->host->i_alloc_sem) to prevent
a race between bmap and truncate. However, such race is present in all the
other filesystems --- it is generally assumed that blocks queried with
get_block won't disappear while get_block is in progress.
The race can be only triggered by root, non-privileged users can't use
bmap, so it is not a security issue (unless there is some program run
by root that bmaps users' files).
This patch fixes the race in a generic way, in all the filesystems. If some
filesystem employs its own locking and doesn't want to take i_alloc_sem
(I don't know about any, where taking i_alloc_sem could be problem),
let it use its own function and not generic_block_bmap.
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
---
fs/buffer.c | 8 ++++++++
fs/fat/inode.c | 2 --
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.29-devel/fs/buffer.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.29-devel.orig/fs/buffer.c 2009-03-29 04:48:38.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.29-devel/fs/buffer.c 2009-03-29 05:26:53.000000000 +0200
@@ -2963,7 +2963,15 @@ sector_t generic_block_bmap(struct addre
tmp.b_state = 0;
tmp.b_blocknr = 0;
tmp.b_size = 1 << inode->i_blkbits;
+
+ /*
+ * Protect the inode from being truncated while get_block is
+ * in progress.
+ */
+ down_read(&mapping->host->i_alloc_sem);
get_block(inode, block, &tmp, 0);
+ up_read(&mapping->host->i_alloc_sem);
+
return tmp.b_blocknr;
}
Index: linux-2.6.29-devel/fs/fat/inode.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.29-devel.orig/fs/fat/inode.c 2009-03-29 04:46:35.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.29-devel/fs/fat/inode.c 2009-03-29 05:26:53.000000000 +0200
@@ -202,9 +202,7 @@ static sector_t _fat_bmap(struct address
sector_t blocknr;
/* fat_get_cluster() assumes the requested blocknr isn't truncated. */
- down_read(&mapping->host->i_alloc_sem);
blocknr = generic_block_bmap(mapping, block, fat_get_block);
- up_read(&mapping->host->i_alloc_sem);
return blocknr;
}
next reply other threads:[~2009-03-30 19:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-30 19:20 Mikulas Patocka [this message]
2009-03-31 14:48 ` [PATCH] fix bmap-vs-truncate race Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-03-31 17:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-03-31 22:42 ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-04-01 11:36 ` Al Viro
2009-04-02 23:22 ` Mikulas Patocka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0903301518120.23576@hs20-bc2-1.build.redhat.com \
--to=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).