From: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
To: Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@oracle.com>
Cc: Micah Dombrowski <mpdwibble@gmail.com>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 'Subset' Hard Links
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:26:38 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0909172121010.6569@cobra.newdream.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AB2E2DE.2030800@oracle.com>
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009, Sunil Mushran wrote:
> Micah Dombrowski wrote:
> > I couldn't think of anywhere else to ask such a question, and google is
> > useless as I have no unique keywords. I am wondering if it is possible with
> > some/any filesystems to have multiple hard links to a file, some of which
> > only point to a subset of the file's data.
> >
> > Eg:
> > firstname -> all data bytes 1 to 10
> > secondname -> bytes 3 to 10
> > thirdname -> bytes 5 to 7
> >
> > This would clearly require some interesting locking of the file WRT writes,
> > but it seems like it should be possible, and even easy for read-only access.
> > I deal with moderately large data files (50+GB), and such a thing would be
> > incredibly useful to me for pulling out interesting bits of my data without
> > having to make copies of the data itself.
> >
> > A related method I was wishing existed would allow concatenation of files
> > simply by deleting all but one hard link, and changing the remaining one to
> > point to all of the original files' data as fragments. This would be great,
> > as 'cat'ing together six 10GB files is pretty slow, and it seems silly to be
> > copying all of that data around when I only need one actual instance of the
> > full data on disk, and that instance already exists, albeit in a fragmented
> > manner.
> >
> > Do any tools for doing this sort of thing exist?
> >
>
> btrfs should able to handle most of this.
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-unstable.git;a=commitdiff;h=c5c9cd4d1b827fe545ed2a945e91e3a6909f3886
Note that currently, you can only clone a range from one file to another.
It should be pretty straightforward to allow cloning from one offset to
another. Or, you can work around it by cloning the range to a temporary
file and then back again at a different offset.
The code can also currently fail when compression is enabled and
you clone a subset of the file (compressed inline extents don't get split
yet).
sage
>
> However, note that file systems operate in terms of blocks. So the start
> offset would need to be block aligned.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-18 4:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-18 0:02 'Subset' Hard Links Micah Dombrowski
2009-09-18 1:31 ` Sunil Mushran
2009-09-18 4:26 ` Sage Weil [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0909172121010.6569@cobra.newdream.net \
--to=sage@newdream.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpdwibble@gmail.com \
--cc=sunil.mushran@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).