From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
lwoodman@redhat.com, "Alasdair G. Kergon" <agk@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] blockdev: turn a rw semaphore into a percpu rw semaphore
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 14:43:10 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1208311442190.2212@file.rdu.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1208311441210.2212@file.rdu.redhat.com>
blockdev: turn a rw semaphore into a percpu rw semaphore
This avoids cache line bouncing when many processes lock the semaphore
for read.
Partially based on a patch by Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>.
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
---
fs/block_dev.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
include/linux/fs.h | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
Index: linux-3.5-fast/fs/block_dev.c
===================================================================
--- linux-3.5-fast.orig/fs/block_dev.c 2012-07-28 18:32:10.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-3.5-fast/fs/block_dev.c 2012-07-28 18:32:12.000000000 +0200
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ int set_blocksize(struct block_device *b
return -EINVAL;
/* Prevent starting I/O or mapping the device */
- down_write(&bdev->bd_block_size_semaphore);
+ percpu_down_write(&bdev->bd_block_size_semaphore);
/* Check that the block device is not memory mapped */
mapping = bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping;
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ int set_blocksize(struct block_device *b
if (!prio_tree_empty(&mapping->i_mmap) ||
!list_empty(&mapping->i_mmap_nonlinear)) {
mutex_unlock(&mapping->i_mmap_mutex);
- up_write(&bdev->bd_block_size_semaphore);
+ percpu_up_write(&bdev->bd_block_size_semaphore);
return -EBUSY;
}
mutex_unlock(&mapping->i_mmap_mutex);
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ int set_blocksize(struct block_device *b
kill_bdev(bdev);
}
- up_write(&bdev->bd_block_size_semaphore);
+ percpu_up_write(&bdev->bd_block_size_semaphore);
return 0;
}
@@ -460,6 +460,12 @@ static struct inode *bdev_alloc_inode(st
struct bdev_inode *ei = kmem_cache_alloc(bdev_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!ei)
return NULL;
+
+ if (unlikely(percpu_init_rwsem(&ei->bdev.bd_block_size_semaphore))) {
+ kmem_cache_free(bdev_cachep, ei);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
return &ei->vfs_inode;
}
@@ -468,6 +474,8 @@ static void bdev_i_callback(struct rcu_h
struct inode *inode = container_of(head, struct inode, i_rcu);
struct bdev_inode *bdi = BDEV_I(inode);
+ percpu_free_rwsem(&bdi->bdev.bd_block_size_semaphore);
+
kmem_cache_free(bdev_cachep, bdi);
}
@@ -491,7 +499,6 @@ static void init_once(void *foo)
inode_init_once(&ei->vfs_inode);
/* Initialize mutex for freeze. */
mutex_init(&bdev->bd_fsfreeze_mutex);
- init_rwsem(&bdev->bd_block_size_semaphore);
}
static inline void __bd_forget(struct inode *inode)
@@ -1592,12 +1599,13 @@ ssize_t blkdev_aio_read(struct kiocb *io
{
ssize_t ret;
struct block_device *bdev = I_BDEV(iocb->ki_filp->f_mapping->host);
+ percpu_rwsem_ptr p;
- down_read(&bdev->bd_block_size_semaphore);
+ p = percpu_down_read(&bdev->bd_block_size_semaphore);
ret = generic_file_aio_read(iocb, iov, nr_segs, pos);
- up_read(&bdev->bd_block_size_semaphore);
+ percpu_up_read(&bdev->bd_block_size_semaphore, p);
return ret;
}
@@ -1616,10 +1624,11 @@ ssize_t blkdev_aio_write(struct kiocb *i
struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
struct block_device *bdev = I_BDEV(file->f_mapping->host);
ssize_t ret;
+ percpu_rwsem_ptr p;
BUG_ON(iocb->ki_pos != pos);
- down_read(&bdev->bd_block_size_semaphore);
+ p = percpu_down_read(&bdev->bd_block_size_semaphore);
ret = __generic_file_aio_write(iocb, iov, nr_segs, &iocb->ki_pos);
if (ret > 0 || ret == -EIOCBQUEUED) {
@@ -1630,7 +1639,7 @@ ssize_t blkdev_aio_write(struct kiocb *i
ret = err;
}
- up_read(&bdev->bd_block_size_semaphore);
+ percpu_up_read(&bdev->bd_block_size_semaphore, p);
return ret;
}
@@ -1640,12 +1649,13 @@ int blkdev_mmap(struct file *file, struc
{
int ret;
struct block_device *bdev = I_BDEV(file->f_mapping->host);
+ percpu_rwsem_ptr p;
- down_read(&bdev->bd_block_size_semaphore);
+ p = percpu_down_read(&bdev->bd_block_size_semaphore);
ret = generic_file_mmap(file, vma);
- up_read(&bdev->bd_block_size_semaphore);
+ percpu_up_read(&bdev->bd_block_size_semaphore, p);
return ret;
}
Index: linux-3.5-fast/include/linux/fs.h
===================================================================
--- linux-3.5-fast.orig/include/linux/fs.h 2012-07-28 18:32:10.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-3.5-fast/include/linux/fs.h 2012-07-28 18:32:12.000000000 +0200
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#include <linux/ioctl.h>
#include <linux/blk_types.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/percpu-rwsem.h>
/*
* It's silly to have NR_OPEN bigger than NR_FILE, but you can change
@@ -714,7 +715,7 @@ struct block_device {
/* Mutex for freeze */
struct mutex bd_fsfreeze_mutex;
/* A semaphore that prevents I/O while block size is being changed */
- struct rw_semaphore bd_block_size_semaphore;
+ struct percpu_rw_semaphore bd_block_size_semaphore;
};
/*
Introduce percpu rw semaphores
When many CPUs are locking a rw semaphore for read concurrently, cache
line bouncing occurs. When a CPU acquires rw semaphore for read, the
CPU writes to the cache line holding the semaphore. Consequently, the
cache line is being moved between CPUs and this slows down semaphore
acquisition.
This patch introduces new percpu rw semaphores. They are functionally
identical to existing rw semaphores, but locking the percpu rw semaphore
for read is faster and locking for write is slower.
The percpu rw semaphore is implemented as a percpu array of rw
semaphores, each semaphore for one CPU. When some thread needs to lock
the semaphore for read, only semaphore on the current CPU is locked for
read. When some thread needs to lock the semaphore for write, semaphores
for all CPUs are locked for write. This avoids cache line bouncing.
Note that the thread that is locking percpu rw semaphore may be
rescheduled, it doesn't cause bug, but cache line bouncing occurs in
this case.
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
---
include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 77 insertions(+)
Index: linux-3.5-fast/include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h
===================================================================
--- /dev/null 1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-3.5-fast/include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h 2012-07-28 18:41:05.000000000 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+#ifndef _LINUX_PERCPU_RWSEM_H
+#define _LINUX_PERCPU_RWSEM_H
+
+#include <linux/rwsem.h>
+#include <linux/percpu.h>
+
+#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
+
+#define percpu_rw_semaphore rw_semaphore
+#define percpu_rwsem_ptr int
+#define percpu_down_read(x) (down_read(x), 0)
+#define percpu_up_read(x, y) up_read(x)
+#define percpu_down_write down_write
+#define percpu_up_write up_write
+#define percpu_init_rwsem(x) (({init_rwsem(x);}), 0)
+#define percpu_free_rwsem(x) do { } while (0)
+
+#else
+
+struct percpu_rw_semaphore {
+ struct rw_semaphore __percpu *s;
+};
+
+typedef struct rw_semaphore *percpu_rwsem_ptr;
+
+static inline percpu_rwsem_ptr percpu_down_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+ struct rw_semaphore *s = __this_cpu_ptr(sem->s);
+ down_read(s);
+ return s;
+}
+
+static inline void percpu_up_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem, percpu_rwsem_ptr s)
+{
+ up_read(s);
+}
+
+static inline void percpu_down_write(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+ int cpu;
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+ struct rw_semaphore *s = per_cpu_ptr(sem->s, cpu);
+ down_write(s);
+ }
+}
+
+static inline void percpu_up_write(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+ int cpu;
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+ struct rw_semaphore *s = per_cpu_ptr(sem->s, cpu);
+ up_write(s);
+ }
+}
+
+static inline int percpu_init_rwsem(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+ int cpu;
+ sem->s = alloc_percpu(struct rw_semaphore);
+ if (unlikely(!sem->s))
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+ struct rw_semaphore *s = per_cpu_ptr(sem->s, cpu);
+ init_rwsem(s);
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static inline void percpu_free_rwsem(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+ free_percpu(sem->s);
+ sem->s = NULL; /* catch use after free bugs */
+}
+
+#endif
+
+#endif
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-31 18:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-28 3:04 Crash when IO is being submitted and block size is changed Mikulas Patocka
2012-06-28 11:15 ` Jan Kara
2012-06-28 15:44 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-06-28 16:53 ` Jan Kara
2012-07-16 0:55 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-07-17 19:19 ` Jeff Moyer
2012-07-19 2:27 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-07-19 13:33 ` Jeff Moyer
2012-07-28 16:40 ` [PATCH 1/3] Fix " Mikulas Patocka
2012-07-28 16:41 ` [PATCH 2/3] Introduce percpu rw semaphores Mikulas Patocka
2012-07-28 16:42 ` [PATCH 3/3] blockdev: turn a rw semaphore into a percpu rw semaphore Mikulas Patocka
2012-07-28 20:44 ` [PATCH 2/3] Introduce percpu rw semaphores Eric Dumazet
2012-07-29 5:13 ` [dm-devel] " Mikulas Patocka
2012-07-29 10:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-07-29 18:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-01 20:07 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-08-01 20:09 ` [PATCH 4/3] " Mikulas Patocka
2012-08-31 18:40 ` [PATCH 0/4] Fix a crash when block device is read and block size is changed at the same time Mikulas Patocka
2012-08-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 1/4] Add a lock that will be needed by the next patch Mikulas Patocka
2012-08-31 18:42 ` [PATCH 2/4] blockdev: fix a crash when block size is changed and I/O is issued simultaneously Mikulas Patocka
2012-08-31 18:43 ` Mikulas Patocka [this message]
2012-08-31 18:43 ` [PATCH 4/4] New percpu lock implementation Mikulas Patocka
2012-08-31 19:27 ` [PATCH 0/4] Fix a crash when block device is read and block size is changed at the same time Mikulas Patocka
2012-08-31 20:11 ` Jeff Moyer
2012-08-31 20:34 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-09-17 21:19 ` Jeff Moyer
2012-09-18 17:04 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-09-18 17:22 ` Jeff Moyer
2012-09-18 18:55 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-09-18 18:58 ` Jeff Moyer
2012-09-18 20:11 ` Jeff Moyer
2012-09-25 17:49 ` Jeff Moyer
2012-09-25 17:59 ` Jens Axboe
2012-09-25 18:11 ` Jens Axboe
2012-09-25 22:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Mikulas Patocka
2012-09-26 5:48 ` Jens Axboe
2012-11-16 22:02 ` Jeff Moyer
2012-09-25 22:50 ` [PATCH 2/2] " Mikulas Patocka
2012-09-25 22:58 ` [PATCH 0/4] " Mikulas Patocka
2012-09-26 13:47 ` Jeff Moyer
2012-09-26 14:35 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-07-30 17:00 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH 2/3] Introduce percpu rw semaphores Paul E. McKenney
2012-07-31 0:00 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-08-01 17:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-29 6:25 ` Crash when IO is being submitted and block size is changed Vyacheslav Dubeyko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.1208311442190.2212@file.rdu.redhat.com \
--to=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lwoodman@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).