From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
To: Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Recent kernel "mount" slow
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 16:09:37 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1211241555470.4300@file.rdu.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAJw_ZvXGKcjfOAS_tRdXJ9SjpCKw1t7rNt+Q=ieCkVJwN2qcg@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, 24 Nov 2012, Jeff Chua wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
> > On 2012-11-22 20:21, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >> Doesn't sound like a fsdevel issue since it seems to be independent of
> >> filesystems. More like some generic block layer thing. Adding Jens
> >> (and quoting the whole thing)
> >>
> >> Jens, any ideas? Most of your stuff came in after -rc2, which would
> >> fit with the fact that most of the slowdown seems to be after -rc2
> >> according to Jeff.
> >
> > No ideas. Looking at what went in from my side, only the rq plug sorting
> > is a core change, and that should not cause any change in behaviour for
> > a single device. That's commit 975927b9.
> >
> >> Jeff, more bisecting would be good, though.
> >
> > Probably required, yes...
>
>
> This one slows mount from 0.012s to 0.168s.
>
> commit 62ac665ff9fc07497ca524bd20d6a96893d11071
> Author: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
> Date: Wed Sep 26 07:46:43 2012 +0200
>
> blockdev: turn a rw semaphore into a percpu rw semaphore
>
>
> There were couple of more changes to percpu-rw-semaphores after
> 3.7.0-rc2 and those slows mount further from 0.168s to 0.500s. I don't
> really know, but I'm suspecting these. Still bisecting.
The problem there is that you either use normal semaphores and slow down
I/O or you use percpu-semaphores, you don't slow down I/O, but you slow
down mount.
So it's better to slow down mount.
(if you don't use any semaphore at all, as it was in 3.6 kernel and
before, there is a race condition that can crash the kernel if someone
does mount and direct I/O read on the same device at the same time)
You can improve mount time if you change all occurences of
synchronize_sched() in include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h to
synchronize_sched_expedited().
But some people say that synchronize_sched_expedited() is bad for real
time latency. (can there be something like: if (realtime)
synchronize_sched(); else synchronize_sched_expedited(); ?)
Mikulas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-24 21:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAAJw_ZtbhE5Jtd4PsWx8a23QdFTW7aMrKBmRf-bo5Wrean9Xhg@mail.gmail.com>
2012-11-20 18:09 ` Recent kernel "mount" slow Jan Kara
2012-11-21 15:46 ` Jeff Chua
2012-11-22 14:30 ` Jeff Chua
2012-11-22 19:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-23 13:24 ` Jens Axboe
2012-11-23 22:21 ` Jeff Chua
2012-11-23 23:31 ` Jeff Chua
2012-11-23 23:48 ` Jeff Chua
2012-11-24 21:09 ` Mikulas Patocka [this message]
2012-11-24 23:23 ` Jeff Chua
2012-11-27 5:57 ` Jeff Chua
2012-11-27 7:38 ` Jens Axboe
2012-11-27 7:44 ` Jens Axboe
2012-11-27 8:45 ` Jeff Chua
2012-11-27 10:06 ` Jeff Chua
2012-11-27 12:33 ` Jens Axboe
2012-11-28 3:57 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-28 8:33 ` Jens Axboe
2012-11-28 13:05 ` Jeff Chua
2012-11-28 17:25 ` [PATCH] Introduce a method to catch mmap_region (was: Recent kernel "mount" slow) Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-28 19:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-28 19:43 ` Al Viro
2012-11-28 19:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-28 22:01 ` [PATCH v2] Do a proper locking for mmap and block size change Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-29 17:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29 18:23 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-29 18:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29 19:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29 19:15 ` Chris Mason
2012-11-29 19:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29 19:48 ` Chris Mason
2012-11-29 19:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29 20:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29 20:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29 21:29 ` Chris Mason
2012-11-29 22:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29 22:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-30 1:16 ` Chris Mason
2012-11-30 2:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-30 2:27 ` Chris Mason
2012-11-30 2:49 ` Dave Chinner
2012-11-30 14:31 ` Chris Mason
2012-11-30 16:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-30 16:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-11-30 22:40 ` Dave Chinner
2012-11-30 23:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-11-29 19:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-28 19:50 ` [PATCH] Introduce a method to catch mmap_region (was: Recent kernel "mount" slow) Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-28 20:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-28 20:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-28 20:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-28 20:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-28 22:10 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-28 21:29 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-28 22:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-28 23:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29 1:20 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-29 0:38 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-29 2:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29 2:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29 6:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29 6:25 ` Al Viro
2012-11-29 6:30 ` Al Viro
2012-11-29 6:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29 6:45 ` Al Viro
2012-11-29 10:57 ` Jeff Chua
2012-11-29 6:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29 14:12 ` Chris Mason
2012-11-29 17:26 ` Chris Mason
2012-11-29 17:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29 17:51 ` Chris Mason
2012-11-29 18:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-28 3:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] percpu-rwsem: use synchronize_sched_expedited Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-28 4:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] block_dev: don't take the write lock if block size doesn't change Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-28 14:24 ` Jeff Chua
2012-11-28 22:03 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-28 14:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] percpu-rwsem: use synchronize_sched_expedited Jeff Chua
2012-11-30 0:06 ` Andrew Morton
2012-11-30 3:00 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-30 13:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-11-30 18:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.1211241555470.4300@file.rdu.redhat.com \
--to=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).