From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] percpu-rwsem: use synchronize_sched_expedited
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 22:59:52 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1211272257140.18338@file.rdu.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAJw_ZsYuLCwCTc6U=ELO_PvyjnVKQdkPke2enfzm6zOeWAqjA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Jeff Chua wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
> > On 2012-11-27 06:57, Jeff Chua wrote:
> >> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:09 AM, Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>>> So it's better to slow down mount.
> >>>
> >>> I am quite proud of the linux boot time pitting against other OS. Even
> >>> with 10 partitions. Linux can boot up in just a few seconds, but now
> >>> you're saying that we need to do this semaphore check at boot up. By
> >>> doing so, it's inducing additional 4 seconds during boot up.
> >>
> >> By the way, I'm using a pretty fast SSD (Samsung PM830) and fast CPU
> >> (2.8GHz). I wonder if those on slower hard disk or slower CPU, what
> >> kind of degradation would this cause or just the same?
> >
> > It'd likely be the same slow down time wise, but as a percentage it
> > would appear smaller on a slower disk.
> >
> > Could you please test Mikulas' suggestion of changing
> > synchronize_sched() in include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h to
> > synchronize_sched_expedited()?
>
> Tested. It seems as fast as before, but may be a "tick" slower. Just
> perception. I was getting pretty much 0.012s with everything reverted.
> With synchronize_sched_expedited(), it seems to be 0.012s ~ 0.013s.
> So, it's good.
>
>
> > linux-next also has a re-write of the per-cpu rw sems, out of Andrews
> > tree. It would be a good data point it you could test that, too.
>
> Tested. It's slower. 0.350s. But still faster than 0.500s without the patch.
>
> # time mount /dev/sda1 /mnt; sync; sync; umount /mnt
>
>
> So, here's the comparison ...
>
> 0.500s 3.7.0-rc7
> 0.168s 3.7.0-rc2
> 0.012s 3.6.0
> 0.013s 3.7.0-rc7 + synchronize_sched_expedited()
> 0.350s 3.7.0-rc7 + Oleg's patch.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Jeff.
OK, I'm seinding two patches to reduce mount times. If it is possible to
put them to 3.7.0, put them there.
Mikulas
---
percpu-rwsem: use synchronize_sched_expedited
Use synchronize_sched_expedited() instead of synchronize_sched()
to improve mount speed.
This patch improves mount time from 0.500s to 0.013s.
Note: if realtime people complain about the use
synchronize_sched_expedited() and synchronize_rcu_expedited(), I suggest
that they introduce an option CONFIG_REALTIME or
/proc/sys/kernel/realtime and turn off these *_expedited functions if
the option is enabled (i.e. turn synchronize_sched_expedited into
synchronize_sched and synchronize_rcu_expedited into synchronize_rcu).
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
---
include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux-3.7-rc7/include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h
===================================================================
--- linux-3.7-rc7.orig/include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h 2012-11-28 02:41:03.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-3.7-rc7/include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h 2012-11-28 02:41:15.000000000 +0100
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ struct percpu_rw_semaphore {
};
#define light_mb() barrier()
-#define heavy_mb() synchronize_sched()
+#define heavy_mb() synchronize_sched_expedited()
static inline void percpu_down_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *p)
{
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ static inline void percpu_down_write(str
{
mutex_lock(&p->mtx);
p->locked = true;
- synchronize_sched(); /* make sure that all readers exit the rcu_read_lock_sched region */
+ synchronize_sched_expedited(); /* make sure that all readers exit the rcu_read_lock_sched region */
while (__percpu_count(p->counters))
msleep(1);
heavy_mb(); /* C, between read of p->counter and write to data, paired with B */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-28 3:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAAJw_ZtbhE5Jtd4PsWx8a23QdFTW7aMrKBmRf-bo5Wrean9Xhg@mail.gmail.com>
2012-11-20 18:09 ` Recent kernel "mount" slow Jan Kara
2012-11-21 15:46 ` Jeff Chua
2012-11-22 14:30 ` Jeff Chua
2012-11-22 19:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-23 13:24 ` Jens Axboe
2012-11-23 22:21 ` Jeff Chua
2012-11-23 23:31 ` Jeff Chua
2012-11-23 23:48 ` Jeff Chua
2012-11-24 21:09 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-24 23:23 ` Jeff Chua
2012-11-27 5:57 ` Jeff Chua
2012-11-27 7:38 ` Jens Axboe
2012-11-27 7:44 ` Jens Axboe
2012-11-27 8:45 ` Jeff Chua
2012-11-27 10:06 ` Jeff Chua
2012-11-27 12:33 ` Jens Axboe
2012-11-28 3:57 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-28 8:33 ` Jens Axboe
2012-11-28 13:05 ` Jeff Chua
2012-11-28 17:25 ` [PATCH] Introduce a method to catch mmap_region (was: Recent kernel "mount" slow) Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-28 19:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-28 19:43 ` Al Viro
2012-11-28 19:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-28 22:01 ` [PATCH v2] Do a proper locking for mmap and block size change Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-29 17:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29 18:23 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-29 18:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29 19:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29 19:15 ` Chris Mason
2012-11-29 19:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29 19:48 ` Chris Mason
2012-11-29 19:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29 20:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29 20:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29 21:29 ` Chris Mason
2012-11-29 22:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29 22:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-30 1:16 ` Chris Mason
2012-11-30 2:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-30 2:27 ` Chris Mason
2012-11-30 2:49 ` Dave Chinner
2012-11-30 14:31 ` Chris Mason
2012-11-30 16:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-30 16:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-11-30 22:40 ` Dave Chinner
2012-11-30 23:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-11-29 19:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-28 19:50 ` [PATCH] Introduce a method to catch mmap_region (was: Recent kernel "mount" slow) Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-28 20:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-28 20:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-28 20:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-28 20:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-28 22:10 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-28 21:29 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-28 22:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-28 23:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29 1:20 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-29 0:38 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-29 2:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29 2:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29 6:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29 6:25 ` Al Viro
2012-11-29 6:30 ` Al Viro
2012-11-29 6:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29 6:45 ` Al Viro
2012-11-29 10:57 ` Jeff Chua
2012-11-29 6:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29 14:12 ` Chris Mason
2012-11-29 17:26 ` Chris Mason
2012-11-29 17:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29 17:51 ` Chris Mason
2012-11-29 18:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-28 3:59 ` Mikulas Patocka [this message]
2012-11-28 4:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] block_dev: don't take the write lock if block size doesn't change Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-28 14:24 ` Jeff Chua
2012-11-28 22:03 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-28 14:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] percpu-rwsem: use synchronize_sched_expedited Jeff Chua
2012-11-30 0:06 ` Andrew Morton
2012-11-30 3:00 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-30 13:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-11-30 18:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.1211272257140.18338@file.rdu.redhat.com \
--to=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).