linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] percpu-rwsem: use synchronize_sched_expedited
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 22:59:52 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1211272257140.18338@file.rdu.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAJw_ZsYuLCwCTc6U=ELO_PvyjnVKQdkPke2enfzm6zOeWAqjA@mail.gmail.com>



On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Jeff Chua wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
> > On 2012-11-27 06:57, Jeff Chua wrote:
> >> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:09 AM, Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>>> So it's better to slow down mount.
> >>>
> >>> I am quite proud of the linux boot time pitting against other OS. Even
> >>> with 10 partitions. Linux can boot up in just a few seconds, but now
> >>> you're saying that we need to do this semaphore check at boot up. By
> >>> doing so, it's inducing additional 4 seconds during boot up.
> >>
> >> By the way, I'm using a pretty fast SSD (Samsung PM830) and fast CPU
> >> (2.8GHz). I wonder if those on slower hard disk or slower CPU, what
> >> kind of degradation would this cause or just the same?
> >
> > It'd likely be the same slow down time wise, but as a percentage it
> > would appear smaller on a slower disk.
> >
> > Could you please test Mikulas' suggestion of changing
> > synchronize_sched() in include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h to
> > synchronize_sched_expedited()?
> 
> Tested. It seems as fast as before, but may be a "tick" slower. Just
> perception. I was getting pretty much 0.012s with everything reverted.
> With synchronize_sched_expedited(), it seems to be 0.012s ~ 0.013s.
> So, it's good.
> 
> 
> > linux-next also has a re-write of the per-cpu rw sems, out of Andrews
> > tree. It would be a good data point it you could test that, too.
> 
> Tested. It's slower. 0.350s. But still faster than 0.500s without the patch.
> 
> # time mount /dev/sda1 /mnt; sync; sync; umount /mnt
> 
> 
> So, here's the comparison ...
> 
> 0.500s     3.7.0-rc7
> 0.168s     3.7.0-rc2
> 0.012s     3.6.0
> 0.013s     3.7.0-rc7 + synchronize_sched_expedited()
> 0.350s     3.7.0-rc7 + Oleg's patch.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Jeff.

OK, I'm seinding two patches to reduce mount times. If it is possible to 
put them to 3.7.0, put them there.

Mikulas

---

percpu-rwsem: use synchronize_sched_expedited

Use synchronize_sched_expedited() instead of synchronize_sched()
to improve mount speed.

This patch improves mount time from 0.500s to 0.013s.

Note: if realtime people complain about the use
synchronize_sched_expedited() and synchronize_rcu_expedited(), I suggest
that they introduce an option CONFIG_REALTIME or
/proc/sys/kernel/realtime and turn off these *_expedited functions if
the option is enabled (i.e. turn synchronize_sched_expedited into
synchronize_sched and synchronize_rcu_expedited into synchronize_rcu).

Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>

---
 include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Index: linux-3.7-rc7/include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h
===================================================================
--- linux-3.7-rc7.orig/include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h	2012-11-28 02:41:03.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-3.7-rc7/include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h	2012-11-28 02:41:15.000000000 +0100
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ struct percpu_rw_semaphore {
 };
 
 #define light_mb()	barrier()
-#define heavy_mb()	synchronize_sched()
+#define heavy_mb()	synchronize_sched_expedited()
 
 static inline void percpu_down_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *p)
 {
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ static inline void percpu_down_write(str
 {
 	mutex_lock(&p->mtx);
 	p->locked = true;
-	synchronize_sched(); /* make sure that all readers exit the rcu_read_lock_sched region */
+	synchronize_sched_expedited(); /* make sure that all readers exit the rcu_read_lock_sched region */
 	while (__percpu_count(p->counters))
 		msleep(1);
 	heavy_mb(); /* C, between read of p->counter and write to data, paired with B */

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-11-28  3:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CAAJw_ZtbhE5Jtd4PsWx8a23QdFTW7aMrKBmRf-bo5Wrean9Xhg@mail.gmail.com>
2012-11-20 18:09 ` Recent kernel "mount" slow Jan Kara
2012-11-21 15:46   ` Jeff Chua
2012-11-22 14:30     ` Jeff Chua
2012-11-22 19:21       ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-23 13:24         ` Jens Axboe
2012-11-23 22:21           ` Jeff Chua
2012-11-23 23:31             ` Jeff Chua
2012-11-23 23:48               ` Jeff Chua
2012-11-24 21:09             ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-24 23:23               ` Jeff Chua
2012-11-27  5:57                 ` Jeff Chua
2012-11-27  7:38                   ` Jens Axboe
2012-11-27  7:44                     ` Jens Axboe
2012-11-27  8:45                       ` Jeff Chua
2012-11-27 10:06                     ` Jeff Chua
2012-11-27 12:33                       ` Jens Axboe
2012-11-28  3:57                         ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-28  8:33                           ` Jens Axboe
2012-11-28 13:05                             ` Jeff Chua
2012-11-28 17:25                             ` [PATCH] Introduce a method to catch mmap_region (was: Recent kernel "mount" slow) Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-28 19:15                               ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-28 19:43                                 ` Al Viro
2012-11-28 19:53                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-28 22:01                                   ` [PATCH v2] Do a proper locking for mmap and block size change Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-29 17:19                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29 18:23                                       ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-29 18:46                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29 19:02                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29 19:15                                         ` Chris Mason
2012-11-29 19:26                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29 19:48                                             ` Chris Mason
2012-11-29 19:55                                               ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29 20:10                                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29 20:52                                               ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29 21:29                                                 ` Chris Mason
2012-11-29 22:16                                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29 22:36                                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-30  1:16                                                       ` Chris Mason
2012-11-30  2:13                                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-30  2:27                                                           ` Chris Mason
2012-11-30  2:49                                                     ` Dave Chinner
2012-11-30 14:31                                                       ` Chris Mason
2012-11-30 16:42                                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-30 16:36                                                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-11-30 22:40                                                         ` Dave Chinner
2012-11-30 23:09                                                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-11-29 19:50                                             ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-28 19:50                                 ` [PATCH] Introduce a method to catch mmap_region (was: Recent kernel "mount" slow) Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-28 20:03                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-28 20:13                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-28 20:32                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-28 20:47                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-28 22:10                                           ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-28 21:29                                       ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-28 22:52                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-28 23:13                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29  1:20                                             ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-29  0:38                                           ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-29  2:04                                             ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29  2:58                                               ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29  6:16                                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29  6:25                                                   ` Al Viro
2012-11-29  6:30                                                     ` Al Viro
2012-11-29  6:37                                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29  6:45                                                         ` Al Viro
2012-11-29 10:57                                                           ` Jeff Chua
2012-11-29  6:33                                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29 14:12                                                   ` Chris Mason
2012-11-29 17:26                                                     ` Chris Mason
2012-11-29 17:26                                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-29 17:51                                                       ` Chris Mason
2012-11-29 18:12                                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-28  3:59                       ` Mikulas Patocka [this message]
2012-11-28  4:01                         ` [PATCH 2/2] block_dev: don't take the write lock if block size doesn't change Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-28 14:24                           ` Jeff Chua
2012-11-28 22:03                             ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-28 14:19                         ` [PATCH 1/2] percpu-rwsem: use synchronize_sched_expedited Jeff Chua
2012-11-30  0:06                         ` Andrew Morton
2012-11-30  3:00                           ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-30 13:42                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-11-30 18:57                           ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.1211272257140.18338@file.rdu.redhat.com \
    --to=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).