From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Morris Subject: Re: [patch 00/11] mount ownership and unprivileged mount syscall (v9) Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 09:51:10 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: References: <20080317200053.447640802@szeredi.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Andrew Morton , Christoph Hellwig , serue@us.ibm.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Smalley , Eric Paris , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org To: Miklos Szeredi Return-path: Received: from namei.org ([69.55.235.186]:48579 "EHLO us.intercode.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753286AbYCQWzE (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Mar 2008 18:55:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080317200053.447640802@szeredi.hu> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Something to consider down the track would be how to possibly allow this with SELinux, which only knows about normal mounts. We might need a user_mount hook which is called once the core kernel code determines that it is a a valid unprivileged mount (although the sb_mount hook will already have been called, IIUC). - James -- James Morris