From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH printk v2 25/38] proc: consoles: document console_lock usage
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 16:40:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y1f1RpMVAo2vHxce@alley> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221019145600.1282823-26-john.ogness@linutronix.de>
On Wed 2022-10-19 17:01:47, John Ogness wrote:
> The console_lock is held throughout the start/show/stop procedure
> to print out device/driver information about all registered
> consoles. Since the console_lock is being used for multiple reasons,
> explicitly document these reasons. This will be useful when the
> console_lock is split into fine-grained locking.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
> ---
> fs/proc/consoles.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/proc/consoles.c b/fs/proc/consoles.c
> index cf2e0788f9c7..32512b477605 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/consoles.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/consoles.c
> @@ -63,6 +63,14 @@ static void *c_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
> struct console *con;
> loff_t off = 0;
>
> + /*
> + * Stop console printing because the device() callback may
> + * assume the console is not within its write() callback.
Like in previous patches, I would prefer to add more information
about this dependency. An example or if it is just to stay
on the safe side.
> + *
> + * Hold the console_lock to guarantee safe traversal of the
> + * console list. SRCU cannot be used because there is no
> + * place to store the SRCU cookie.
It might be possible to crate a custom struct for passing both
the next struct console and SRCU cookie. But it probably
is not worth it.
> + */
> console_lock();
> for_each_console(con)
> if (off++ == *pos)
Best Regards,
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-25 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-19 14:55 [PATCH printk v2 00/38] reduce console_lock scope John Ogness
2022-10-19 14:55 ` [PATCH printk v2 02/38] printk: Convert console_drivers list to hlist John Ogness
2022-10-19 15:44 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-10-19 21:46 ` John Ogness
2022-10-20 7:43 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-10-20 12:36 ` Petr Mladek
2022-10-24 5:23 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-10-19 14:55 ` [PATCH printk v2 25/38] proc: consoles: document console_lock usage John Ogness
2022-10-25 14:40 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2022-10-19 14:55 ` [PATCH printk v2 36/38] proc: consoles: use console_list_lock for list iteration John Ogness
2022-10-27 12:02 ` Petr Mladek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y1f1RpMVAo2vHxce@alley \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).