linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] xfs: use iomap_valid method to detect stale cached iomaps
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 01:41:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y2ItNSakpecwC9Va@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221101003412.3842572-7-david@fromorbit.com>

> +	*((int *)&iomap->private) = sequence;

> +static bool
> +xfs_buffered_write_iomap_valid(
> +	struct inode		*inode,
> +	const struct iomap	*iomap)
> +{
> +	int			seq = *((int *)&iomap->private);

I really hate this stuffing of the sequence into the private pointer.
The iomap structure isn't so size constrained that we have to do that,
so we can just add a sequence number field directly to it.  I don't
think that is a layering violation, as the concept of a sequence
numebr is pretty generic and we'll probably need it for all file systems
eventually.

> +
> +	if (seq != READ_ONCE(XFS_I(inode)->i_df.if_seq))
> +		return false;

Which makes me wonder if we could do away with the callback entirely
by adding an option sequence number pointer to the iomap_iter.  If set
the core code compares it against iomap->seq and we get rid of the
per-folio indirect call, and boilerplate code that would need to be
implemented in every file system.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-11-02  8:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-01  0:34 xfs, iomap: fix data corrupton due to stale cached iomaps Dave Chinner
2022-11-01  0:34 ` [PATCH 1/7] xfs: write page faults in iomap are not buffered writes Dave Chinner
2022-11-02  7:17   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-02 16:12   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-11-02 21:11     ` Dave Chinner
2022-11-01  0:34 ` [PATCH 2/7] xfs: punching delalloc extents on write failure is racy Dave Chinner
2022-11-02  7:18   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-02 16:22   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-11-01  0:34 ` [PATCH 3/7] xfs: use byte ranges for write cleanup ranges Dave Chinner
2022-11-02  7:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-02 16:32   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-11-04  5:40     ` Dave Chinner
2022-11-07 23:53       ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-11-01  0:34 ` [PATCH 4/7] xfs: buffered write failure should not truncate the page cache Dave Chinner
2022-11-01 11:57   ` kernel test robot
2022-11-02  7:24   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-02 20:57     ` Dave Chinner
2022-11-02 16:41   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-11-02 21:04     ` Dave Chinner
2022-11-02 22:26       ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-11-04  8:08   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-04 23:10     ` Dave Chinner
2022-11-07 23:48       ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-11-01  0:34 ` [PATCH 5/7] iomap: write iomap validity checks Dave Chinner
2022-11-02  8:36   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-02 16:43     ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-11-02 16:58       ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-11-03  0:35         ` Dave Chinner
2022-11-04  8:12           ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-02 16:57   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-11-01  0:34 ` [PATCH 6/7] xfs: use iomap_valid method to detect stale cached iomaps Dave Chinner
2022-11-01  9:15   ` kernel test robot
2022-11-02  8:41   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2022-11-02 21:39     ` Dave Chinner
2022-11-04  8:14       ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-02 17:19   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-11-02 22:36     ` Dave Chinner
2022-11-08  0:00       ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-11-01  0:34 ` [PATCH 7/7] xfs: drop write error injection is unfixable, remove it Dave Chinner
2022-11-01  3:39 ` xfs, iomap: fix data corrupton due to stale cached iomaps Darrick J. Wong
2022-11-01  4:21   ` Dave Chinner
2022-11-02 17:23     ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y2ItNSakpecwC9Va@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).